Personal Networks Classic Readings and New Directions in Egocentric Analysis
The Enormous Flock of Homophily Researchers: Assessing and Promoting a Research Agenda
Publication
, Chapter
McPherson, M; Smith-Lovin, L; Rawlings, C
January 1, 2021
McPherson, Smith-Lovin, and Cook’s (2001) Annual Review of Sociology piece “Birds of a Feather” (“Birds”, hereafter) focused on the phenomenon of homophily – the empirical reality that connections are more likely between similar others than dissimilar others.
Duke Scholars
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Rawlings, C. (2021). The Enormous Flock of Homophily Researchers: Assessing and Promoting a Research Agenda. In Personal Networks Classic Readings and New Directions in Egocentric Analysis (pp. 459–470). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108878296.033
McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and C. Rawlings. “The Enormous Flock of Homophily Researchers: Assessing and Promoting a Research Agenda.” In Personal Networks Classic Readings and New Directions in Egocentric Analysis, 459–70, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108878296.033.
McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Rawlings C. The Enormous Flock of Homophily Researchers: Assessing and Promoting a Research Agenda. In: Personal Networks Classic Readings and New Directions in Egocentric Analysis. 2021. p. 459–70.
McPherson, M., et al. “The Enormous Flock of Homophily Researchers: Assessing and Promoting a Research Agenda.” Personal Networks Classic Readings and New Directions in Egocentric Analysis, 2021, pp. 459–70. Scopus, doi:10.1017/9781108878296.033.
McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Rawlings C. The Enormous Flock of Homophily Researchers: Assessing and Promoting a Research Agenda. Personal Networks Classic Readings and New Directions in Egocentric Analysis. 2021. p. 459–470.