Skip to main content

Patient-specific Cervical Deformity Corrections With Consideration of Associated Risk: Establishment of Risk Benefit Thresholds for Invasiveness Based on Deformity and Frailty Severity.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Passias, PG; Pierce, KE; Williamson, TK; Lebovic, J; Schoenfeld, AJ; Lafage, R; Lafage, V; Gum, JL; Eastlack, R; Kim, HJ; Klineberg, EO ...
Published in: Clin Spine Surg
February 1, 2024

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This was a retrospective cohort study. BACKGROUND: Little is known of the intersection between surgical invasiveness, cervical deformity (CD) severity, and frailty. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of CD surgery by invasiveness, frailty status, and baseline magnitude of deformity. METHODS: This study included CD patients with 1-year follow-up. Patients stratified in high deformity if severe in the following criteria: T1 slope minus cervical lordosis, McGregor's slope, C2-C7, C2-T3, and C2 slope. Frailty scores categorized patients into not frail and frail. Patients are categorized by frailty and deformity (not frail/low deformity; not frail/high deformity; frail/low deformity; frail/high deformity). Logistic regression assessed increasing invasiveness and outcomes [distal junctional failure (DJF), reoperation]. Within frailty/deformity groups, decision tree analysis assessed thresholds for an invasiveness cutoff above which experiencing a reoperation, DJF or not achieving Good Clinical Outcome was more likely. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were included. Frailty/deformity groups: 27% not frail/low deformity, 27% not frail/high deformity, 23.5% frail/low deformity, and 22.5% frail/high deformity. Logistic regression analysis found increasing invasiveness and occurrence of DJF [odds ratio (OR): 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05, P =0.002], and invasiveness increased with deformity severity ( P <0.05). Not frail/low deformity patients more often met Optimal Outcome with an invasiveness index <63 (OR: 27.2, 95% CI: 2.7-272.8, P =0.005). An invasiveness index <54 for the frail/low deformity group led to a higher likelihood of meeting the Optimal Outcome (OR: 9.6, 95% CI: 1.5-62.2, P =0.018). For the frail/high deformity group, patients with a score <63 had a higher likelihood of achieving Optimal Outcome (OR: 4.8, 95% CI: 1.1-25.8, P =0.033). There was no significant cutoff of invasiveness for the not frail/high deformity group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study correlated increased invasiveness in CD surgery to the risk of DJF, reoperation, and poor clinical success. The thresholds derived for deformity severity and frailty may enable surgeons to individualize the invasiveness of their procedures during surgical planning to account for the heightened risk of adverse events and minimize unfavorable outcomes.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Clin Spine Surg

DOI

EISSN

2380-0194

Publication Date

February 1, 2024

Volume

37

Issue

1

Start / End Page

E43 / E51

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Risk Assessment
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Lordosis
  • Humans
  • Frailty
  • Cervical Vertebrae
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Passias, P. G., Pierce, K. E., Williamson, T. K., Lebovic, J., Schoenfeld, A. J., Lafage, R., … International Spine Study Group. (2024). Patient-specific Cervical Deformity Corrections With Consideration of Associated Risk: Establishment of Risk Benefit Thresholds for Invasiveness Based on Deformity and Frailty Severity. Clin Spine Surg, 37(1), E43–E51. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001540
Passias, Peter G., Katherine E. Pierce, Tyler K. Williamson, Jordan Lebovic, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, Renaud Lafage, Virginie Lafage, et al. “Patient-specific Cervical Deformity Corrections With Consideration of Associated Risk: Establishment of Risk Benefit Thresholds for Invasiveness Based on Deformity and Frailty Severity.Clin Spine Surg 37, no. 1 (February 1, 2024): E43–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001540.
Passias PG, Pierce KE, Williamson TK, Lebovic J, Schoenfeld AJ, Lafage R, et al. Patient-specific Cervical Deformity Corrections With Consideration of Associated Risk: Establishment of Risk Benefit Thresholds for Invasiveness Based on Deformity and Frailty Severity. Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Feb 1;37(1):E43–51.
Passias, Peter G., et al. “Patient-specific Cervical Deformity Corrections With Consideration of Associated Risk: Establishment of Risk Benefit Thresholds for Invasiveness Based on Deformity and Frailty Severity.Clin Spine Surg, vol. 37, no. 1, Feb. 2024, pp. E43–51. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001540.
Passias PG, Pierce KE, Williamson TK, Lebovic J, Schoenfeld AJ, Lafage R, Lafage V, Gum JL, Eastlack R, Kim HJ, Klineberg EO, Daniels AH, Protopsaltis TS, Mundis GM, Scheer JK, Park P, Chou D, Line B, Hart RA, Burton DC, Bess S, Schwab FJ, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Ames CP, International Spine Study Group. Patient-specific Cervical Deformity Corrections With Consideration of Associated Risk: Establishment of Risk Benefit Thresholds for Invasiveness Based on Deformity and Frailty Severity. Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Feb 1;37(1):E43–E51.

Published In

Clin Spine Surg

DOI

EISSN

2380-0194

Publication Date

February 1, 2024

Volume

37

Issue

1

Start / End Page

E43 / E51

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Risk Assessment
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Lordosis
  • Humans
  • Frailty
  • Cervical Vertebrae