Implementation of a diagnostic stewardship intervention to improve blood-culture utilization in 2 surgical ICUs: Time for a blood-culture change.

We compared the number of blood-culture events before and after the introduction of a blood-culture algorithm and provider feedback. Secondary objectives were the comparison of blood-culture positivity and negative safety signals before and after the intervention.Prospective cohort design.Two surgical intensive care units (ICUs): general and trauma surgery and cardiothoracic surgery.Patients aged ≥18 years and admitted to the ICU at the time of the blood-culture event.We used an interrupted time series to compare rates of blood-culture events (ie, blood-culture events per 1,000 patient days) before and after the algorithm implementation with weekly provider feedback.The blood-culture event rate decreased from 100 to 55 blood-culture events per 1,000 patient days in the general surgery and trauma ICU (72% reduction; incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.46; P < .01) and from 102 to 77 blood-culture events per 1,000 patient days in the cardiothoracic surgery ICU (55% reduction; IRR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.39-0.52; P < .01). We did not observe any differences in average monthly antibiotic days of therapy, mortality, or readmissions between the pre- and postintervention periods.We implemented a blood-culture algorithm with data feedback in 2 surgical ICUs, and we observed significant decreases in the rates of blood-culture events without an increase in negative safety signals, including ICU length of stay, mortality, antibiotic use, or readmissions.

Duke Scholars

Author Sarah Stamps Lewis Medicine, Infectious Diseases

Author Nitin Lee Mehdiratta Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine

Author Diana Alame Pathology

Author Deverick John Anderson Medicine, Infectious Diseases

Author Jessica Seidelman Medicine, Infectious Diseases

Author Rebekah Moehring Medicine, Infectious Diseases

Author Erin Brooke Gettler Medicine, Infectious Diseases