Skip to main content

Comparison of the Efficacy of HSK3486 and Propofol for Induction of General Anesthesia in Adults: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Phase 3 Noninferiority Trial.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Gan, TJ; Bertoch, T; Habib, AS; Yan, P; Zhou, R; Lai, Y-L; Liu, X; Essandoh, M; Daley, WL; Gelb, AW
Published in: Anesthesiology
April 1, 2024

BACKGROUND: Propofol is an intravenous anesthetic associated with hypotension, respiratory depression, and injection-site pain. HSK3486 injectable emulsion (ciprofol) is a 2,6-disubstituted phenol derivative with fast onset and quick, stable recovery. Previous studies support HSK3486 as an effective, safe anesthetic with substantially less injection-site pain than propofol. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the noninferiority of HSK3486 compared with propofol in successful general anesthesia induction. METHODS: Two hundred fifty-five participants were enrolled in HSK3486-304, a multicenter, randomized (2:1), double-blind, propofol-controlled, phase 3 study evaluating HSK3486 for general anesthesia induction in adults undergoing elective surgery with tracheal intubation. The primary endpoint was successful anesthesia induction, defined as 1 or less on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale. Key secondary endpoints were proportion of participants with injection-site pain on the Numerical Rating Scale of 1 or greater and a composite endpoint, including the proportion of participants successfully induced while maintaining the desired anesthetic depth and without substantial cardiac and respiratory events. Safety endpoints included adverse events, abnormal vital signs, and injection-site pain. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-one participants (HSK3486, n = 168; propofol, n = 83) were included in the analyses. General anesthesia was successfully induced in 97.0% versus 97.6% of participants with HSK3486 and propofol, respectively. The difference in success rate was -0.57% (95% CI, -5.4 to 4.2%); the noninferiority boundary of -8% was not crossed. Thirty participants (18.0%) had injection-site pain with HSK3486 versus 64 (77.1%) with propofol (P < 0.0001). Eighty-one participants (48.2%) with HSK3486 versus 42 (50.6%) with propofol (P = 0.8780) satisfied the composite endpoint. When injection-site pain was excluded, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events related to study drug was 17.9% for HSK3486 and 14.5% for propofol. CONCLUSIONS: The study met its primary objective and endpoint, demonstrating noninferiority of HSK3486 compared with propofol in successful anesthetic induction. Substantially less injection-site pain was associated with HSK3486 than with propofol.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Anesthesiology

DOI

EISSN

1528-1175

Publication Date

April 1, 2024

Volume

140

Issue

4

Start / End Page

690 / 700

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Propofol
  • Pain
  • Hypotension
  • Humans
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Anesthetics, Intravenous
  • Anesthesiology
  • Anesthesia, General
  • Adult
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Gan, T. J., Bertoch, T., Habib, A. S., Yan, P., Zhou, R., Lai, Y.-L., … Gelb, A. W. (2024). Comparison of the Efficacy of HSK3486 and Propofol for Induction of General Anesthesia in Adults: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Phase 3 Noninferiority Trial. Anesthesiology, 140(4), 690–700. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004886
Gan, Tong J., Todd Bertoch, Ashraf S. Habib, Pangke Yan, Rong Zhou, Yu-Ling Lai, Xiao Liu, Michael Essandoh, William L. Daley, and Adrian W. Gelb. “Comparison of the Efficacy of HSK3486 and Propofol for Induction of General Anesthesia in Adults: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Phase 3 Noninferiority Trial.Anesthesiology 140, no. 4 (April 1, 2024): 690–700. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004886.
Gan, Tong J., et al. “Comparison of the Efficacy of HSK3486 and Propofol for Induction of General Anesthesia in Adults: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Phase 3 Noninferiority Trial.Anesthesiology, vol. 140, no. 4, Apr. 2024, pp. 690–700. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000004886.
Gan TJ, Bertoch T, Habib AS, Yan P, Zhou R, Lai Y-L, Liu X, Essandoh M, Daley WL, Gelb AW. Comparison of the Efficacy of HSK3486 and Propofol for Induction of General Anesthesia in Adults: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Phase 3 Noninferiority Trial. Anesthesiology. 2024 Apr 1;140(4):690–700.

Published In

Anesthesiology

DOI

EISSN

1528-1175

Publication Date

April 1, 2024

Volume

140

Issue

4

Start / End Page

690 / 700

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Propofol
  • Pain
  • Hypotension
  • Humans
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Anesthetics, Intravenous
  • Anesthesiology
  • Anesthesia, General
  • Adult
  • 3202 Clinical sciences