Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Randomized Comparison of Electronic Health Record Alert Types in Eliciting Responses about Prognosis in Gynecologic Oncology Patients.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Musser, RC; Senior, R; Havrilesky, LJ; Buuck, J; Casarett, DJ; Ibrahim, S; Davidson, BA
Published in: Appl Clin Inform
March 2024

OBJECTIVES:  To compare the ability of different electronic health record alert types to elicit responses from users caring for cancer patients benefiting from goals of care (GOC) conversations. METHODS:  A validated question asking if the user would be surprised by the patient's 6-month mortality was built as an Epic BestPractice Advisory (BPA) alert in three versions-(1) Required on Open chart (pop-up BPA), (2) Required on Close chart (navigator BPA), and (3) Optional Persistent (Storyboard BPA)-randomized using patient medical record number. Meaningful responses were defined as "Yes" or "No," rather than deferral. Data were extracted over 6 months. RESULTS:  Alerts appeared for 685 patients during 1,786 outpatient encounters. Measuring encounters where a meaningful response was elicited, rates were highest for Required on Open (94.8% of encounters), compared with Required on Close (90.1%) and Optional Persistent (19.7%) (p < 0.001). Measuring individual alerts to which responses were given, they were most likely meaningful with Optional Persistent (98.3% of responses) and least likely with Required on Open (68.0%) (p < 0.001). Responses of "No," suggesting poor prognosis and prompting GOC, were more likely with Optional Persistent (13.6%) and Required on Open (10.3%) than with Required on Close (7.0%) (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION:  Required alerts had response rates almost five times higher than optional alerts. Timing of alerts affects rates of meaningful responses and possibly the response itself. The alert with the most meaningful responses was also associated with the most interruptions and deferral responses. Considering tradeoffs in these metrics is important in designing clinical decision support to maximize success.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Appl Clin Inform

DOI

EISSN

1869-0327

Publication Date

March 2024

Volume

15

Issue

2

Start / End Page

204 / 211

Location

Germany

Related Subject Headings

  • Prognosis
  • Medical Order Entry Systems
  • Humans
  • Genital Neoplasms, Female
  • Female
  • Electronic Health Records
  • Decision Support Systems, Clinical
  • Communication
  • 4203 Health services and systems
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Musser, R. C., Senior, R., Havrilesky, L. J., Buuck, J., Casarett, D. J., Ibrahim, S., & Davidson, B. A. (2024). Randomized Comparison of Electronic Health Record Alert Types in Eliciting Responses about Prognosis in Gynecologic Oncology Patients. Appl Clin Inform, 15(2), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2247-9355
Musser, Robert Clayton, Rashaud Senior, Laura J. Havrilesky, Jordan Buuck, David J. Casarett, Salam Ibrahim, and Brittany A. Davidson. “Randomized Comparison of Electronic Health Record Alert Types in Eliciting Responses about Prognosis in Gynecologic Oncology Patients.Appl Clin Inform 15, no. 2 (March 2024): 204–11. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2247-9355.
Musser RC, Senior R, Havrilesky LJ, Buuck J, Casarett DJ, Ibrahim S, et al. Randomized Comparison of Electronic Health Record Alert Types in Eliciting Responses about Prognosis in Gynecologic Oncology Patients. Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Mar;15(2):204–11.
Musser, Robert Clayton, et al. “Randomized Comparison of Electronic Health Record Alert Types in Eliciting Responses about Prognosis in Gynecologic Oncology Patients.Appl Clin Inform, vol. 15, no. 2, Mar. 2024, pp. 204–11. Pubmed, doi:10.1055/a-2247-9355.
Musser RC, Senior R, Havrilesky LJ, Buuck J, Casarett DJ, Ibrahim S, Davidson BA. Randomized Comparison of Electronic Health Record Alert Types in Eliciting Responses about Prognosis in Gynecologic Oncology Patients. Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Mar;15(2):204–211.
Journal cover image

Published In

Appl Clin Inform

DOI

EISSN

1869-0327

Publication Date

March 2024

Volume

15

Issue

2

Start / End Page

204 / 211

Location

Germany

Related Subject Headings

  • Prognosis
  • Medical Order Entry Systems
  • Humans
  • Genital Neoplasms, Female
  • Female
  • Electronic Health Records
  • Decision Support Systems, Clinical
  • Communication
  • 4203 Health services and systems
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences