Skip to main content

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Disease With and Without Diabetes: Findings From a Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Gaba, P; Sabik, JF; Murphy, SA; Bellavia, A; O'Gara, PT; Smith, PK; Serruys, PW; Kappetein, AP; Park, S-J; Park, D-W; Christiansen, EH ...
Published in: Circulation
April 23, 2024

BACKGROUND: Diabetes may be associated with differential outcomes in patients undergoing left main coronary revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes in patients with left main disease with and without diabetes randomized to PCI versus CABG. METHODS: Individual patient data were pooled from 4 trials (SYNTAX [Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery], PRECOMBAT [Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery Versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease], NOBLE [Nordic-Baltic-British Left Main Revascularisation Study], and EXCEL [Evaluation of XIENCE Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization]) that randomized patients with left main disease to PCI or CABG. Patients were considered suitable for either approach. Patients were categorized by diabetes status. Kaplan-Meier event rates, Cox model hazard ratios, and interactions were assessed. RESULTS: Among 4393 patients, 1104 (25.1%) had diabetes. Patients with diabetes experienced higher rates of 5-year death (158/1104 [Kaplan-Meier rate, 14.7%] versus 297/3289 [9.3%]; P<0.001), spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI; 67/1104 [6.7%] versus 114/3289 [3.7%]; P<0.001), and repeat revascularization (189/1104 [18.5%] versus 410/3289 [13.2%]; P<0.001). Rates of all-cause mortality did not differ after PCI versus CABG in those with (84/563 [15.3%] versus 74/541 [14.1%]; hazard ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.82-1.52]) or without (155/1634 [9.7%] versus 142/1655 [8.9%]; hazard ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.86-1.36; PintHR=0.87) diabetes. Rates of stroke within 1 year were lower with PCI versus CABG in the entire population, with no heterogeneity based on diabetes status (PintHR=0.51). The 5-year rates of spontaneous MI and repeat coronary revascularization were higher after PCI regardless of diabetes status (spontaneous MI: 45/563 [8.9%] versus 22/541 [4.4%] in diabetes and 82/1634 [5.3%] versus 32/1655 [2.1%] in no diabetes, PintHR=0.47; repeat revascularization: 127/563 [24.5%] versus 62/541 [12.4%] in diabetes and 254/1634 [16.3%] versus 156/1655 [10.1%] in no diabetes, PintHR=0.18). For spontaneous MI and repeat revascularization, there were greater absolute risk differences beyond 1 year in patients with diabetes (4.9% and 9.9%) compared with those without (2.1% and 4.3%; PintARD=0.047 and 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with left main disease considered equally suitable for PCI or CABG and with largely low to intermediate SYNTAX scores, diabetes was associated with higher rates of death and cardiovascular events through 5 years. Compared with CABG, PCI resulted in no difference in the risk of death and a lower risk of early stroke regardless of diabetes status, and a higher risk of spontaneous MI and repeat coronary revascularization, with larger late absolute excess risks in patients with diabetes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT01205776, NCT0146651, NCT00422968, and NCT00114972.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Circulation

DOI

EISSN

1524-4539

Publication Date

April 23, 2024

Volume

149

Issue

17

Start / End Page

1328 / 1338

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Drug-Eluting Stents
  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Coronary Artery Disease
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Gaba, P., Sabik, J. F., Murphy, S. A., Bellavia, A., O’Gara, P. T., Smith, P. K., … Bergmark, B. A. (2024). Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Disease With and Without Diabetes: Findings From a Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials. Circulation, 149(17), 1328–1338. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065571
Gaba, Prakriti, Joseph F. Sabik, Sabina A. Murphy, Andrea Bellavia, Patrick T. O’Gara, Peter K. Smith, Patrick W. Serruys, et al. “Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Disease With and Without Diabetes: Findings From a Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials.Circulation 149, no. 17 (April 23, 2024): 1328–38. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065571.
Gaba P, Sabik JF, Murphy SA, Bellavia A, O’Gara PT, Smith PK, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, Park S-J, Park D-W, Christiansen EH, Holm NR, Nielsen PH, Sabatine MS, Stone GW, Bergmark BA. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Disease With and Without Diabetes: Findings From a Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials. Circulation. 2024 Apr 23;149(17):1328–1338.

Published In

Circulation

DOI

EISSN

1524-4539

Publication Date

April 23, 2024

Volume

149

Issue

17

Start / End Page

1328 / 1338

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Drug-Eluting Stents
  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Coronary Artery Disease