Skip to main content

Frameworks for procurement, integration, monitoring, and evaluation of artificial intelligence tools in clinical settings: A systematic review.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Khan, SD; Hoodbhoy, Z; Raja, MHR; Kim, JY; Hogg, HDJ; Manji, AAA; Gulamali, F; Hasan, A; Shaikh, A; Tajuddin, S; Khan, NS; Patel, MR; Balu, S ...
Published in: PLOS Digit Health
May 2024

Research on the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in medicine has increased exponentially over the last few years but its implementation in clinical practice has not seen a commensurate increase with a lack of consensus on implementing and maintaining such tools. This systematic review aims to summarize frameworks focusing on procuring, implementing, monitoring, and evaluating AI tools in clinical practice. A comprehensive literature search, following PRSIMA guidelines was performed on MEDLINE, Wiley Cochrane, Scopus, and EBSCO databases, to identify and include articles recommending practices, frameworks or guidelines for AI procurement, integration, monitoring, and evaluation. From the included articles, data regarding study aim, use of a framework, rationale of the framework, details regarding AI implementation involving procurement, integration, monitoring, and evaluation were extracted. The extracted details were then mapped on to the Donabedian Plan, Do, Study, Act cycle domains. The search yielded 17,537 unique articles, out of which 47 were evaluated for inclusion based on their full texts and 25 articles were included in the review. Common themes extracted included transparency, feasibility of operation within existing workflows, integrating into existing workflows, validation of the tool using predefined performance indicators and improving the algorithm and/or adjusting the tool to improve performance. Among the four domains (Plan, Do, Study, Act) the most common domain was Plan (84%, n = 21), followed by Study (60%, n = 15), Do (52%, n = 13), & Act (24%, n = 6). Among 172 authors, only 1 (0.6%) was from a low-income country (LIC) and 2 (1.2%) were from lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). Healthcare professionals cite the implementation of AI tools within clinical settings as challenging owing to low levels of evidence focusing on integration in the Do and Act domains. The current healthcare AI landscape calls for increased data sharing and knowledge translation to facilitate common goals and reap maximum clinical benefit.

Duke Scholars

Published In

PLOS Digit Health

DOI

EISSN

2767-3170

Publication Date

May 2024

Volume

3

Issue

5

Start / End Page

e0000514

Location

United States
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Khan, S. D., Hoodbhoy, Z., Raja, M. H. R., Kim, J. Y., Hogg, H. D. J., Manji, A. A. A., … Sendak, M. P. (2024). Frameworks for procurement, integration, monitoring, and evaluation of artificial intelligence tools in clinical settings: A systematic review. PLOS Digit Health, 3(5), e0000514. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000514
Khan, Sarim Dawar, Zahra Hoodbhoy, Mohummad Hassan Raza Raja, Jee Young Kim, Henry David Jeffry Hogg, Afshan Anwar Ali Manji, Freya Gulamali, et al. “Frameworks for procurement, integration, monitoring, and evaluation of artificial intelligence tools in clinical settings: A systematic review.PLOS Digit Health 3, no. 5 (May 2024): e0000514. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000514.
Khan SD, Hoodbhoy Z, Raja MHR, Kim JY, Hogg HDJ, Manji AAA, et al. Frameworks for procurement, integration, monitoring, and evaluation of artificial intelligence tools in clinical settings: A systematic review. PLOS Digit Health. 2024 May;3(5):e0000514.
Khan, Sarim Dawar, et al. “Frameworks for procurement, integration, monitoring, and evaluation of artificial intelligence tools in clinical settings: A systematic review.PLOS Digit Health, vol. 3, no. 5, May 2024, p. e0000514. Pubmed, doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000514.
Khan SD, Hoodbhoy Z, Raja MHR, Kim JY, Hogg HDJ, Manji AAA, Gulamali F, Hasan A, Shaikh A, Tajuddin S, Khan NS, Patel MR, Balu S, Samad Z, Sendak MP. Frameworks for procurement, integration, monitoring, and evaluation of artificial intelligence tools in clinical settings: A systematic review. PLOS Digit Health. 2024 May;3(5):e0000514.

Published In

PLOS Digit Health

DOI

EISSN

2767-3170

Publication Date

May 2024

Volume

3

Issue

5

Start / End Page

e0000514

Location

United States