Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Health-care workforce implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Brindis, CD; Laitner, MH; Clayton, EW; Scrimshaw, SC; Grosz, BJ; Simpson, LA; Rosenbaum, S; Brierley, CL; Simon, MA; Roubideaux, Y; Calonge, BN ...
Published in: Lancet
June 22, 2024

The Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Supreme Court decision, which revoked the constitutional right to abortion in the USA, has impacted the national medical workforce. Impacts vary across states, but providers in states with restrictive abortion laws now must contend with evolving legal and ethical challenges that have the potential to affect workforce safety, mental health, education, and training opportunities, in addition to having serious impacts on patient health and far-reaching societal consequences. Moreover, Dobbs has consequences on almost every facet of the medical workforce, including on physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and others who work within the health-care system. Comprehensive research is urgently needed to understand the wide-ranging implications of Dobbs on the medical workforce, including legal, ethical, clinical, and psychological dimensions, to inform evidence-based policies and standards of care in abortion-restrictive settings. Lessons from the USA might also have global relevance for countries facing similar restrictions on reproductive care.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Lancet

DOI

EISSN

1474-547X

Publication Date

June 22, 2024

Volume

403

Issue

10445

Start / End Page

2747 / 2750

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • General & Internal Medicine
  • 42 Health sciences
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Brindis, C. D., Laitner, M. H., Clayton, E. W., Scrimshaw, S. C., Grosz, B. J., Simpson, L. A., … Dzau, V. J. (2024). Health-care workforce implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision. Lancet, 403(10445), 2747–2750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00581-6
Brindis, Claire D., Melissa H. Laitner, Ellen Wright Clayton, Susan C. Scrimshaw, Barbara J. Grosz, Lisa A. Simpson, Sara Rosenbaum, et al. “Health-care workforce implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.Lancet 403, no. 10445 (June 22, 2024): 2747–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00581-6.
Brindis CD, Laitner MH, Clayton EW, Scrimshaw SC, Grosz BJ, Simpson LA, et al. Health-care workforce implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision. Lancet. 2024 Jun 22;403(10445):2747–50.
Brindis, Claire D., et al. “Health-care workforce implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.Lancet, vol. 403, no. 10445, June 2024, pp. 2747–50. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00581-6.
Brindis CD, Laitner MH, Clayton EW, Scrimshaw SC, Grosz BJ, Simpson LA, Rosenbaum S, Brierley CL, Simon MA, Roubideaux Y, Calonge BN, Johnson PA, DeStefano L, Bear A, Arora KS, Dzau VJ. Health-care workforce implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision. Lancet. 2024 Jun 22;403(10445):2747–2750.
Journal cover image

Published In

Lancet

DOI

EISSN

1474-547X

Publication Date

June 22, 2024

Volume

403

Issue

10445

Start / End Page

2747 / 2750

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • General & Internal Medicine
  • 42 Health sciences
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences