Impact of Hepatitis B Virus Point-of-care DNA Viral Load Testing Compared With Laboratory-based Standard-of-care Approaches on Uptake of HBV Viral Load Testing, Treatment, and Turnaround Times: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care (PoC) hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA viral load (VL) assays represent an alternative to laboratory-based standard-of-care (SoC) VL assays to accelerate diagnosis and treatment. We evaluated the impact of using PoC versus SoC approaches on the uptake of VL testing, treatment, and turnaround times from testing to treatment across the HBV care cascade. METHODS: We searched 5 databases, 6 conference websites, and contacted manufacturers for unpublished reports, for articles with or without a comparator (SoC VL testing), and had data on the uptake of VL testing, treatment, or turnaround times between hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) testing, VL testing, and treatment in the cascade. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis on rates of VL testing and treatment initiation. RESULTS: Six studies, composing 9 arms, were included. Three PoC arms reported less than 1 day between screening for HBsAg positivity and VL testing, and the other one (2 arms) reported it between 7 and 11 days. Five arms reported the time to available VL test results (<1 day). Three studies reported 1-8 days between VL testing results and treatment initiation. Two studies reported the turnaround times between a positive HBsAg screening and treatment initiation (the same day and 27 days). Overall, 84.1% of those with HBsAg positivity were tested for DNA VL and 88.3% of eligible people initiated treatment. CONCLUSIONS: HBV PoC DNA testing appears to be associated with a turnaround time of <1 day for receipt of VL results and appears associated with high rates of DNA testing and initiation of treatment among those eligible. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023398440.

Duke Scholars

Author Michael Anthony Moody Pediatrics, Infectious Diseases