Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Genetic vulnerability and adverse mental health outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis of CENTER-TBI and TRACK-TBI cohorts.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Kals, M; Wilson, L; Levey, DF; Parodi, L; Steyerberg, EW; Richardson, S; He, F; Sun, X; Jain, S; Palotie, A; Ripatti, S; Rosand, J; Maas, AIR ...
Published in: EClinicalMedicine
December 2024

BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression are common after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), but their biological drivers are uncertain. We therefore explored whether polygenic risk scores (PRS) derived for PTSD and major depressive disorder (MDD) are associated with the development of cognate TBI-related phenotypes. METHODS: Meta-analyses were conducted using data from two multicenter, prospective observational cohort studies of patients with mTBI: the CENTER-TBI study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02210221) in Europe (December 2014-December 2017) and the TRACK-TBI study in the US (March 2014-July 2018). In both cohorts, the most common causes of injury were road traffic accidents and falls. Primary outcomes, specifically probable PTSD and depression, were defined at 6 months post-injury using scores ≥33 on the PTSD Checklist-5 and ≥15 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, respectively. We calculated PTSD-PRS and MDD-PRS for patients aged ≥17 years who had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13-15 upon hospital arrival and assessed their association with PTSD and depression following TBI. We also evaluated the transferability of the findings in a cohort of African Americans. FINDINGS: Overall, 11.8% (219/1869) and 6.7% (124/1869) patients were classified as having probable PTSD and depression, respectively. The PTSD-PRS was significantly associated with higher adjusted odds of PTSD in both cohorts, with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.55 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.30-1.84, p < 0.001, I 2  = 20.8%]. Although the MDD-PRS increased the risk of depression after TBI, it did not reach significance in the individual cohorts. However, in a combined analysis, the risk was significantly elevated with a pooled OR of 1.26 [95% CI 1.03-1.53, p = 0.02, I 2  = 0%]. The addition of PRSs improved the proportion of outcome variance explained in the two study cohorts from 19.5% and 30.3% to 21.6% and 34.0% for PTSD; and from 11.0% and 22.5% to 12.8% and 22.6% for depression. Patients in the highest cognate PRS quintile had increased odds of 3.16 [95% CI 1.80-5.55] and 2.03 [95% CI 1.04-3.94] of developing PTSD or depression compared to the lowest quintile, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Associations of PRSs with PTSD and depression following TBI are not disorder-specific. However, the overlap between MDD-PRS and depression following TBI is less robust compared to PTSD-PRS and PTSD. PRSs could improve risk prediction, and permit enrichment for interventional trials. FUNDING: This study was supported by funding by an FP7 grant from the European Union, Hannelore Kohl Stiftung, Integra LifeSciences Corporation, NeuroTrauma Sciences, US National Institutes of Health, US Department of Defense, National Football League Advisory Board, US Department of Energy, and One Mind.

Duke Scholars

Published In

EClinicalMedicine

DOI

EISSN

2589-5370

Publication Date

December 2024

Volume

78

Start / End Page

102956

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • 4206 Public health
  • 4203 Health services and systems
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kals, M., Wilson, L., Levey, D. F., Parodi, L., Steyerberg, E. W., Richardson, S., … Genetic Associations In Neurotrauma (GAIN) Consortium (with contribution from the CENTER-TBI and TRACK-TBI studies). (2024). Genetic vulnerability and adverse mental health outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis of CENTER-TBI and TRACK-TBI cohorts. EClinicalMedicine, 78, 102956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102956
Kals, Mart, Lindsay Wilson, Daniel F. Levey, Livia Parodi, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Sylvia Richardson, Feng He, et al. “Genetic vulnerability and adverse mental health outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis of CENTER-TBI and TRACK-TBI cohorts.EClinicalMedicine 78 (December 2024): 102956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102956.
Kals M, Wilson L, Levey DF, Parodi L, Steyerberg EW, Richardson S, et al. Genetic vulnerability and adverse mental health outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis of CENTER-TBI and TRACK-TBI cohorts. EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Dec;78:102956.
Kals, Mart, et al. “Genetic vulnerability and adverse mental health outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis of CENTER-TBI and TRACK-TBI cohorts.EClinicalMedicine, vol. 78, Dec. 2024, p. 102956. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102956.
Kals M, Wilson L, Levey DF, Parodi L, Steyerberg EW, Richardson S, He F, Sun X, Jain S, Palotie A, Ripatti S, Rosand J, Manley GT, Maas AIR, Stein MB, Menon DK, Genetic Associations In Neurotrauma (GAIN) Consortium (with contribution from the CENTER-TBI and TRACK-TBI studies). Genetic vulnerability and adverse mental health outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis of CENTER-TBI and TRACK-TBI cohorts. EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Dec;78:102956.
Journal cover image

Published In

EClinicalMedicine

DOI

EISSN

2589-5370

Publication Date

December 2024

Volume

78

Start / End Page

102956

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • 4206 Public health
  • 4203 Health services and systems
  • 3202 Clinical sciences