Validation and Recalibration of a Model for Predicting Surgical-Site Infection After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to externally validate and recalibrate a previously developed model for predicting postoperative surgical-site infection (SSI) after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. METHODS: This study utilized a previously validated model for predicting post-POP surgery SSI within 90 days of surgery using a Medicare population. For this study, the model was externally validated and recalibrated using the Premier Healthcare Database (PHD) and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) database. Discriminatory performance was assessed via the c-statistic and calibration was assessed using calibration curves. Methods of recalibration in the large and logistic recalibration were used to update the models. RESULTS: The PHD contained 420,277 POP procedures meeting the inclusion criteria and 1.6% resulted in SSI. The NSQIP dataset contained 62,553 POP surgeries and 1.4% resulted in SSI. Discrimination of the original model was comparable with that seen in the initial validation (c-statistic = 0.57 in PHD, 0.59 in NSQIP vs 0.60 in the original Medicare data). Recalibration greatly improved model calibration when evaluated in NSQIP data. CONCLUSION: A previously developed model for predicting SSI after POP surgery demonstrated stable discriminatory ability when externally validated on the PHD and NSQIP databases. Model recalibration was necessary to improve prediction. Prospective studies are needed to validate the clinical utility of such a model.

Duke Scholars

Author John E Jelovsek Obstetrics and Gynecology, Urogynecology