Skip to main content

Optimization of Photon-Counting CT Myelography for the Detection of CSF-Venous Fistulas Using Convolutional Neural Network Denoising: A Comparative Analysis of Reconstruction Techniques.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Madhavan, AA; Zhou, Z; Farnsworth, PJ; Thorne, J; Amrhein, TJ; Kranz, PG; Brinjikji, W; Cutsforth-Gregory, JK; Kodet, ML; Weber, NM; Diehn, FE ...
Published in: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
June 19, 2025

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Photon-counting detector CT myelography (PCD-CTM) is a recently described technique used for detecting spinal CSF leaks, including CSF-venous fistulas. Various image reconstruction techniques, including smoother-versus-sharper kernels and virtual monoenergetic images, are available with photon-counting CT. Moreover, denoising algorithms have shown promise in improving sharp kernel images. No prior studies have compared image quality of these different reconstructions on photon-counting CT myelography. Here, we sought to compare several image reconstructions using various parameters important for the detection of CSF-venous fistulas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all consecutive decubitus PCD-CTM between February 1, 2022, and August 1, 2024, at 1 institution. We included patients whose studies had the following reconstructions: Br48-40 keV virtual monoenergetic reconstruction, Br56 low-energy threshold (T3D), Qr89-T3D denoised with quantum iterative reconstruction, and Qr89-T3D denoised with a convolutional neural network algorithm. We excluded patients who had extradural CSF on preprocedural imaging or a technically unsatisfactory myelogram-. All 4 reconstructions were independently reviewed by 2 neuroradiologists. Each reviewer rated spatial resolution, noise, the presence of artifacts, image quality, and diagnostic confidence (whether positive or negative) on a 1-5 scale. These metrics were compared using the Friedman test. Additionally, noise and contrast were quantitatively assessed by a third reviewer and compared. RESULTS: The Qr89 reconstructions demonstrated higher spatial resolution than their Br56 or Br48-40keV counterparts. Qr89 with convolutional neural network denoising had less noise, better image quality, and improved diagnostic confidence compared with Qr89 with quantum iterative reconstruction denoising. The Br48-40keV reconstruction had the highest contrast-to-noise ratio quantitatively. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the sharpest quantitative kernel (Qr89-T3D) with convolutional neural network denoising demonstrated the best performance regarding spatial resolution, noise level, image quality, and diagnostic confidence for detecting or excluding the presence of a CSF-venous fistula.

Duke Scholars

Published In

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

DOI

EISSN

1936-959X

Publication Date

June 19, 2025

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 3406 Physical chemistry
  • 3209 Neurosciences
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1109 Neurosciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Madhavan, A. A., Zhou, Z., Farnsworth, P. J., Thorne, J., Amrhein, T. J., Kranz, P. G., … Yu, L. (2025). Optimization of Photon-Counting CT Myelography for the Detection of CSF-Venous Fistulas Using Convolutional Neural Network Denoising: A Comparative Analysis of Reconstruction Techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8695
Madhavan, Ajay A., Zhongxing Zhou, Paul J. Farnsworth, Jamison Thorne, Timothy J. Amrhein, Peter G. Kranz, Waleed Brinjikji, et al. “Optimization of Photon-Counting CT Myelography for the Detection of CSF-Venous Fistulas Using Convolutional Neural Network Denoising: A Comparative Analysis of Reconstruction Techniques.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, June 19, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8695.
Madhavan AA, Zhou Z, Farnsworth PJ, Thorne J, Amrhein TJ, Kranz PG, Brinjikji W, Cutsforth-Gregory JK, Kodet ML, Weber NM, Thompson G, Diehn FE, Yu L. Optimization of Photon-Counting CT Myelography for the Detection of CSF-Venous Fistulas Using Convolutional Neural Network Denoising: A Comparative Analysis of Reconstruction Techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Jun 19;

Published In

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

DOI

EISSN

1936-959X

Publication Date

June 19, 2025

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 3406 Physical chemistry
  • 3209 Neurosciences
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1109 Neurosciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences