Skip to main content
Journal cover image

An Open-label, Randomized Study of Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System Versus Best Alternative Care in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Zager, JS; Orloff, M; Ferrucci, PF; Choi, J; Eschelman, DJ; Glazer, ES; Ejaz, A; Howard, JH; Richtig, E; Ochsenreither, S; Reddy, SA; Lowe, MC ...
Published in: Ann Surg Oncol
July 2025

BACKGROUND: Metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) has a poor prognosis, with liver metastases typically presenting a therapeutic challenge. Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System (Melphalan/HDS) is a drug/medical device combination used for liver-directed treatment of unresectable mUM patients. This study assessed efficacy and safety of Melphalan/HDS versus best alternative care (BAC). METHODS: Eligible patients with unresectable mUM were randomized (1:1) to receive Melphalan/HDS (3 mg/kg ideal body weight) once every 6 to 8 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles or BAC. Due to slow enrollment and patient reluctance to receive BAC treatment, the study design was amended to a single-arm Melphalan/HDS study, and all efficacy analyses of the randomized study were treated as exploratory. RESULTS: The study enrolled 85 patients. Eligible patients were randomized to receive Melphalan/HDS (n = 43) or BAC (n = 42), and 72 patients received study treatment (Melphalan/HDS [n = 40]; BAC [n = 32]). Exploratory analyses of efficacy endpoints showed numerical differences consistently favoring the Melphalan/HDS arm versus BAC (median overall survival: 18.5 vs. 14.5 months; median progression-free survival: 9.1 vs. 3.3 months; objective response rate: 27.5% vs. 9.4%; and disease control rate: 80.0% vs. 46.9%). Serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 51.2% of Melphalan/HDS and in 21.9% of BAC patients. The most common (>5%) SAEs included thrombocytopenia (19.5%), neutropenia (9.8%), leukopenia (9.8%) and febrile neutropenia (7.3%) in Melphalan/HDS patients and cholecystitis, nausea and vomiting (6.3% each) in BAC patients. No treatment-related deaths were observed. CONCLUSION: Treatment with Melphalan/HDS shows clinically meaningful efficacy and demonstrates a favorable benefit-risk profile in patients with unresectable mUM as compared to BAC.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Ann Surg Oncol

DOI

EISSN

1534-4681

Publication Date

July 2025

Volume

32

Issue

7

Start / End Page

4976 / 4988

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Uveal Neoplasms
  • Uveal Melanoma
  • Survival Rate
  • Prognosis
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Middle Aged
  • Melphalan
  • Melanoma
  • Male
  • Liver Neoplasms
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Zager, J. S., Orloff, M., Ferrucci, P. F., Choi, J., Eschelman, D. J., Glazer, E. S., … Ottensmeier, C. H. (2025). An Open-label, Randomized Study of Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System Versus Best Alternative Care in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol, 32(7), 4976–4988. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17231-x
Zager, Jonathan S., Marlana Orloff, Pier Francesco Ferrucci, Junsung Choi, David J. Eschelman, Evan S. Glazer, Aslam Ejaz, et al. “An Open-label, Randomized Study of Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System Versus Best Alternative Care in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.Ann Surg Oncol 32, no. 7 (July 2025): 4976–88. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17231-x.
Zager JS, Orloff M, Ferrucci PF, Choi J, Eschelman DJ, Glazer ES, et al. An Open-label, Randomized Study of Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System Versus Best Alternative Care in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul;32(7):4976–88.
Zager, Jonathan S., et al. “An Open-label, Randomized Study of Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System Versus Best Alternative Care in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.Ann Surg Oncol, vol. 32, no. 7, July 2025, pp. 4976–88. Pubmed, doi:10.1245/s10434-025-17231-x.
Zager JS, Orloff M, Ferrucci PF, Choi J, Eschelman DJ, Glazer ES, Ejaz A, Howard JH, Richtig E, Ochsenreither S, Reddy SA, Lowe MC, Beasley GM, Gesierich A, Bender A, Gschnell M, Dummer R, Rivoire M, Arance A, Fenwick SW, Sacco JJ, Haferkamp S, Weishaupt C, John J, Wheater M, Ottensmeier CH. An Open-label, Randomized Study of Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System Versus Best Alternative Care in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul;32(7):4976–4988.
Journal cover image

Published In

Ann Surg Oncol

DOI

EISSN

1534-4681

Publication Date

July 2025

Volume

32

Issue

7

Start / End Page

4976 / 4988

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Uveal Neoplasms
  • Uveal Melanoma
  • Survival Rate
  • Prognosis
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Middle Aged
  • Melphalan
  • Melanoma
  • Male
  • Liver Neoplasms