Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Real-World Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Associated With First-Line Dronedarone Versus First-Line Ablation in Adults With Atrial Fibrillation.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Greene, SJ; Schilsky, S; Roberts, AW; Kabadi, SM; McKindley, DS; Preblick, R; Rashkin, J; Leeming, RC; Sajedian, RM; Russo, AM
Published in: Clin Cardiol
June 2025

BACKGROUND: Rhythm control therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) or catheter ablation is recommended for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). The impact of first-line AAD therapy (including dronedarone) or ablation on health care resource utilization (HCRU) is unclear. METHODS: Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (January 1, 2012 to January 31, 2022) was used to assess US adults with AF (within 1 year) and no prior AADs who received first-line dronedarone or first-line ablation (including non-dronedarone AADs then ablation within 90 days) using a comparative cohort design. Dronedarone and ablation cohorts were propensity score matched. HCRU and per-patient per-month (PPPM) payer costs were compared over 24-months' follow-up. Sensitivity analyses assessing first-line ablation with no prior AADs were conducted. RESULTS: Post-matching, dronedarone and ablation cohorts (n = 1440) were similar. Event rate ratios (ERR; [95% CI]) for inpatient (0.85 [0.77-0.93]), any outpatient (0.95 [0.94-0.96]), or emergency room (0.91 [0.85-0.97]) visits, or atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA)/AF-related procedures (0.72 [0.71-0.74]) were significantly lower with first-line dronedarone versus ablation (all p < 0.01). Dronedarone was associated with reduced mean PPPM costs for total HCRU (-$2603), any outpatient visits (-$2401), and ATA/AF-related procedures (-$1880) versus ablation (all p < 0.01). In contrast to the primary analysis, sensitivity analyses showed no significant difference in ERR for all-cause inpatient or any outpatient visits, but dronedarone remained associated with significantly lower mean PPPM total costs. CONCLUSION: Over 24-months' follow-up in patients with AF, first-line dronedarone was associated with comparable rates of inpatient/outpatient visits, and lower total payer costs compared with an ablation-based approach.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Clin Cardiol

DOI

EISSN

1932-8737

Publication Date

June 2025

Volume

48

Issue

6

Start / End Page

e70145

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Health Resources
  • Health Care Costs
  • Follow-Up Studies
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Greene, S. J., Schilsky, S., Roberts, A. W., Kabadi, S. M., McKindley, D. S., Preblick, R., … Russo, A. M. (2025). Real-World Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Associated With First-Line Dronedarone Versus First-Line Ablation in Adults With Atrial Fibrillation. Clin Cardiol, 48(6), e70145. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.70145
Greene, Stephen J., Samantha Schilsky, Andrew W. Roberts, Shaum M. Kabadi, David S. McKindley, Ron Preblick, Jason Rashkin, Reno C. Leeming, Renee M. Sajedian, and Andrea M. Russo. “Real-World Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Associated With First-Line Dronedarone Versus First-Line Ablation in Adults With Atrial Fibrillation.Clin Cardiol 48, no. 6 (June 2025): e70145. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.70145.
Greene SJ, Schilsky S, Roberts AW, Kabadi SM, McKindley DS, Preblick R, et al. Real-World Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Associated With First-Line Dronedarone Versus First-Line Ablation in Adults With Atrial Fibrillation. Clin Cardiol. 2025 Jun;48(6):e70145.
Greene, Stephen J., et al. “Real-World Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Associated With First-Line Dronedarone Versus First-Line Ablation in Adults With Atrial Fibrillation.Clin Cardiol, vol. 48, no. 6, June 2025, p. e70145. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/clc.70145.
Greene SJ, Schilsky S, Roberts AW, Kabadi SM, McKindley DS, Preblick R, Rashkin J, Leeming RC, Sajedian RM, Russo AM. Real-World Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Associated With First-Line Dronedarone Versus First-Line Ablation in Adults With Atrial Fibrillation. Clin Cardiol. 2025 Jun;48(6):e70145.
Journal cover image

Published In

Clin Cardiol

DOI

EISSN

1932-8737

Publication Date

June 2025

Volume

48

Issue

6

Start / End Page

e70145

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Health Resources
  • Health Care Costs
  • Follow-Up Studies