Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Biomechanical Comparison of 1- and 2-Tunnel Suture Suspensionplasty Constructs for Basilar Thumb Arthritis.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Lorenzana, DJ; Abar, B; DiPrinzio, EV; Vail, E; Welch, JM; Klifto, CS; Ruch, DS; Richard, MJ; Gall, K; Pidgeon, TS
Published in: Hand (N Y)
July 11, 2025

BACKGROUND: Trapeziectomy with suture button suspensionplasty (SBS) is a common treatment for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of bone tunnel configuration and suture count on the construct stability. METHODS: Twelve matched specimens underwent trapeziectomy and randomization to either a 2-strand 1-tunnel (single SBS) or divergent 4-strand 2-tunnel suture button (crossed dual SBS) construct. Mechanical stiffness was measured using material testing machine with a semiconstrained axial load over 5-mm displacement. Trapezial space was measured under no load and in a light and heavy physiologic pinch grip models. Subsequently, specimens were randomized to undergo single SBS or divergent 2-strand 2-tunnel suture (crossed suture) constructs, and loaded pinch testing was performed. Primary outcomes were analyzed using matched-pair t-tests. RESULTS: The crossed dual SBS construct showed significantly higher stiffness compared to the single SBS construct in elastic deformation (19.9 vs 15.5 N/mm, P = .010) and maintained trapezial height better in both light (82% vs 71%, P = .021) and heavy (73% vs 46%, p = .004) pinch grips. The crossed suture technique also preserved trapezial height better than the single SBS construct in light (79% vs 64%, P = 0.021) and heavy (60% vs 44%, P = 0.039) pinch grips. CONCLUSIONS: In the immediate postoperative period, a crossed dual SBS construct was stiffer to axial load and more stable in pinch grip compared to a single SBS construct. The novel crossed suture construct better preserved trapezial height then the singe SBS, suggesting that the crossed configuration may be more relevant than suture count in postoperative stability.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Hand (N Y)

DOI

EISSN

1558-9455

Publication Date

July 11, 2025

Start / End Page

15589447251350175

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Orthopedics
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Lorenzana, D. J., Abar, B., DiPrinzio, E. V., Vail, E., Welch, J. M., Klifto, C. S., … Pidgeon, T. S. (2025). Biomechanical Comparison of 1- and 2-Tunnel Suture Suspensionplasty Constructs for Basilar Thumb Arthritis. Hand (N Y), 15589447251350176. https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447251350175
Lorenzana, Daniel J., Bijan Abar, Eliseo V. DiPrinzio, Elijah Vail, Jessica M. Welch, Christopher S. Klifto, David S. Ruch, Marc J. Richard, Ken Gall, and Tyler S. Pidgeon. “Biomechanical Comparison of 1- and 2-Tunnel Suture Suspensionplasty Constructs for Basilar Thumb Arthritis.Hand (N Y), July 11, 2025, 15589447251350176. https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447251350175.
Lorenzana DJ, Abar B, DiPrinzio EV, Vail E, Welch JM, Klifto CS, et al. Biomechanical Comparison of 1- and 2-Tunnel Suture Suspensionplasty Constructs for Basilar Thumb Arthritis. Hand (N Y). 2025 Jul 11;15589447251350176.
Lorenzana, Daniel J., et al. “Biomechanical Comparison of 1- and 2-Tunnel Suture Suspensionplasty Constructs for Basilar Thumb Arthritis.Hand (N Y), July 2025, p. 15589447251350176. Pubmed, doi:10.1177/15589447251350175.
Lorenzana DJ, Abar B, DiPrinzio EV, Vail E, Welch JM, Klifto CS, Ruch DS, Richard MJ, Gall K, Pidgeon TS. Biomechanical Comparison of 1- and 2-Tunnel Suture Suspensionplasty Constructs for Basilar Thumb Arthritis. Hand (N Y). 2025 Jul 11;15589447251350176.
Journal cover image

Published In

Hand (N Y)

DOI

EISSN

1558-9455

Publication Date

July 11, 2025

Start / End Page

15589447251350175

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Orthopedics
  • 3202 Clinical sciences