Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Fréchet radiomic distance (FRD): A versatile metric for comparing medical imaging datasets.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Konz, N; Osuala, R; Verma, P; Chen, Y; Gu, H; Dong, H; Chen, Y; Marshall, A; Garrucho, L; Kushibar, K; Lang, DM; Kim, GS; Grimm, LJ; Diaz, O ...
Published in: Med Image Anal
January 24, 2026

Determining whether two sets of images belong to the same or different distributions or domains is a crucial task in modern medical image analysis and deep learning; for example, to evaluate the output quality of image generative models. Currently, metrics used for this task either rely on the (potentially biased) choice of some downstream task, such as segmentation, or adopt task-independent perceptual metrics (e.g., Fréchet Inception Distance/FID) from natural imaging, which we show insufficiently capture anatomical features. To this end, we introduce a new perceptual metric tailored for medical images, FRD (Fréchet Radiomic Distance), which utilizes standardized, clinically meaningful, and interpretable image features. We show that FRD is superior to other image distribution metrics for a range of medical imaging applications, including out-of-domain (OOD) detection, the evaluation of image-to-image translation (by correlating more with downstream task performance as well as anatomical consistency and realism), and the evaluation of unconditional image generation. Moreover, FRD offers additional benefits such as stability and computational efficiency at low sample sizes, sensitivity to image corruptions and adversarial attacks, feature interpretability, and correlation with radiologist-perceived image quality. Additionally, we address key gaps in the literature by presenting an extensive framework for the multifaceted evaluation of image similarity metrics in medical imaging-including the first large-scale comparative study of generative models for medical image translation-and release an accessible codebase to facilitate future research. Our results are supported by thorough experiments spanning a variety of datasets, modalities, and downstream tasks, highlighting the broad potential of FRD for medical image analysis.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Med Image Anal

DOI

EISSN

1361-8423

Publication Date

January 24, 2026

Volume

110

Start / End Page

103943

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 40 Engineering
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
  • 09 Engineering
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Konz, N., Osuala, R., Verma, P., Chen, Y., Gu, H., Dong, H., … Mazurowski, M. A. (2026). Fréchet radiomic distance (FRD): A versatile metric for comparing medical imaging datasets. Med Image Anal, 110, 103943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2026.103943
Konz, Nicholas, Richard Osuala, Preeti Verma, Yuwen Chen, Hanxue Gu, Haoyu Dong, Yaqian Chen, et al. “Fréchet radiomic distance (FRD): A versatile metric for comparing medical imaging datasets.Med Image Anal 110 (January 24, 2026): 103943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2026.103943.
Konz N, Osuala R, Verma P, Chen Y, Gu H, Dong H, et al. Fréchet radiomic distance (FRD): A versatile metric for comparing medical imaging datasets. Med Image Anal. 2026 Jan 24;110:103943.
Konz, Nicholas, et al. “Fréchet radiomic distance (FRD): A versatile metric for comparing medical imaging datasets.Med Image Anal, vol. 110, Jan. 2026, p. 103943. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.media.2026.103943.
Konz N, Osuala R, Verma P, Chen Y, Gu H, Dong H, Marshall A, Garrucho L, Kushibar K, Lang DM, Kim GS, Grimm LJ, Lewin JM, Duncan JS, Schnabel JA, Diaz O, Lekadir K, Mazurowski MA. Fréchet radiomic distance (FRD): A versatile metric for comparing medical imaging datasets. Med Image Anal. 2026 Jan 24;110:103943.
Journal cover image

Published In

Med Image Anal

DOI

EISSN

1361-8423

Publication Date

January 24, 2026

Volume

110

Start / End Page

103943

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 40 Engineering
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
  • 09 Engineering