Skip to main content

An indirect comparison of zanubrutinib vs acalabrutinib plus venetoclax in patients with treatment-naive CLL.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Shadman, M; Tam, CS; Brander, DM; Lefebure, M; Yang, K; Xu, S; Tian, T; Kuptsova-Clarkson, N; Williams, R; Hirata, J; Munir, T
Published in: Blood Adv
April 28, 2026

In the phase 3 randomized SEQUOIA study (NCT03336333), zanubrutinib (arm A) demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared with bendamustine-rituximab (BR; arm B) in patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) without del(17p). In the phase 3 AMPLIFY study (NCT03836261), acalabrutinib-venetoclax with or without obinutuzumab demonstrated prolonged PFS vs chemoimmunotherapy (investigator's choice of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab [FCR] or BR) in patients with treatment-naive CLL without del(17p) or TP53 mutations. Compared with AMPLIFY, the patient population in SEQUOIA was unsuitable for FCR and included patients with TP53 mutations. The aim of this post hoc analysis was to investigate the efficacy of zanubrutinib in patients from SEQUOIA vs a clinically similar patient population treated with acalabrutinib-venetoclax in AMPLIFY. A numerically greater 3-year investigator-assessed PFS (PFS-INV) was observed with zanubrutinib (84.3%) in the SEQUOIA population vs acalabrutinib-venetoclax in AMPLIFY (78.9%). When matching SEQUOIA to the AMPLIFY population by FCR eligibility, a greater PFS benefit with zanubrutinib was reported (89.2% vs 78.9%, respectively). To support the comparison of zanubrutinib vs acalabrutinib-venetoclax, an anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison was performed, which showed that zanubrutinib was associated with prolonged PFS-INV vs acalabrutinib-venetoclax when adjusted for various baseline characteristics. Zanubrutinib also demonstrated longer PFS whether adjusted for age (PFS-INV hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.54; P< .0003) or unadjusted (PFS-INV HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.88; P = .0197). These results highlight zanubrutinib monotherapy as an effective treatment option for all patients with treatment-naive CLL/SLL, including patients who might otherwise be considered for more intensive fixed-duration combination regimens.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Blood Adv

DOI

EISSN

2473-9537

Publication Date

April 28, 2026

Volume

10

Issue

8

Start / End Page

2599 / 2607

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Sulfonamides
  • Pyrimidines
  • Pyrazoles
  • Pyrazines
  • Piperidines
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Shadman, M., Tam, C. S., Brander, D. M., Lefebure, M., Yang, K., Xu, S., … Munir, T. (2026). An indirect comparison of zanubrutinib vs acalabrutinib plus venetoclax in patients with treatment-naive CLL. Blood Adv, 10(8), 2599–2607. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025018536
Shadman, Mazyar, Constantine S. Tam, Danielle M. Brander, Marcus Lefebure, Keri Yang, Sheng Xu, Tian Tian, et al. “An indirect comparison of zanubrutinib vs acalabrutinib plus venetoclax in patients with treatment-naive CLL.Blood Adv 10, no. 8 (April 28, 2026): 2599–2607. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025018536.
Shadman M, Tam CS, Brander DM, Lefebure M, Yang K, Xu S, et al. An indirect comparison of zanubrutinib vs acalabrutinib plus venetoclax in patients with treatment-naive CLL. Blood Adv. 2026 Apr 28;10(8):2599–607.
Shadman, Mazyar, et al. “An indirect comparison of zanubrutinib vs acalabrutinib plus venetoclax in patients with treatment-naive CLL.Blood Adv, vol. 10, no. 8, Apr. 2026, pp. 2599–607. Pubmed, doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2025018536.
Shadman M, Tam CS, Brander DM, Lefebure M, Yang K, Xu S, Tian T, Kuptsova-Clarkson N, Williams R, Hirata J, Munir T. An indirect comparison of zanubrutinib vs acalabrutinib plus venetoclax in patients with treatment-naive CLL. Blood Adv. 2026 Apr 28;10(8):2599–2607.

Published In

Blood Adv

DOI

EISSN

2473-9537

Publication Date

April 28, 2026

Volume

10

Issue

8

Start / End Page

2599 / 2607

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Sulfonamides
  • Pyrimidines
  • Pyrazoles
  • Pyrazines
  • Piperidines
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell
  • Humans