Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Contraceptive practices during monitoring for molar pregnancy: A mixed methods analysis.

Journal articles  - Journal Article
Sheffield, SM; Fitch, KC; Broadwater, G; Niedzwiecki, D; Hagey, JM; Davidson, BA
Published in: Contraception
July 14, 2026

OBJECTIVE: To describe patterns in contraceptive use and factors influencing contraceptive decision-making during the post-molar beta-hCG monitoring period. STUDY DESIGN: This was a mixed methods analysis of patients who received care for molar pregnancy at a regional gestational trophoblastic disease center in the South between March 1996 and February 2025. Associations between demographic factors and contraception use during monitoring were assessed using chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Semi-structured interviews were conducted from December 2024 to April 2025 until thematic saturation was reached with patients diagnosed since August 2022, to minimize recall bias. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for patterns using NVivo 14. RESULTS: A total of 264 patients were identified for the database. Ten completed a qualitative interview, of whom four did not use contraception during monitoring. Most identified as white (56.4% in database, 70% among those interviewed) and non-Hispanic (85.7%, 70%, respectively). Within the database, 21.6% reported no contraception use during monitoring. The most utilized methods were combined hormonal contraceptives (37.5%), barrier methods (21.6%), and medroxyprogesterone acetate injection (14.8%). Significant differences in method were identified based on age, race, county, and number of live births at molar pregnancy diagnosis. In interviews, participants discussed several key findings related to contraceptive decision-making: (1) familiarity, (2) temporary use, (3) importance of monitoring, (4) side effects, and (5) trying new things. CONCLUSION: Despite guideline-based recommendations, more than one-fifth of patients did not use contraception during monitoring for molar pregnancy. Qualitative data demonstrate that method selection is uniquely shaped by the importance of beta-hCG monitoring and desire for expeditious return to fertility. IMPLICATIONS: One-fifth of patients did not use contraception during molar pregnancy monitoring, highlighting an opportunity for improved contraceptive counseling and alignment with guidelines to reduce the risk of unintended pregnancy and avoid potential confounding of malignant transformation.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Contraception

DOI

EISSN

1879-0518

Publication Date

July 14, 2026

Volume

163

Start / End Page

111556

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • 4203 Health services and systems
  • 3215 Reproductive medicine
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Sheffield, S. M., Fitch, K. C., Broadwater, G., Niedzwiecki, D., Hagey, J. M., & Davidson, B. A. (2026). Contraceptive practices during monitoring for molar pregnancy: A mixed methods analysis. Contraception, 163, 111556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2026.111556
Sheffield, Sydney Mei, Katherine C. Fitch, Gloria Broadwater, Donna Niedzwiecki, Jill M. Hagey, and Brittany A. Davidson. “Contraceptive practices during monitoring for molar pregnancy: A mixed methods analysis.Contraception 163 (July 14, 2026): 111556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2026.111556.
Sheffield SM, Fitch KC, Broadwater G, Niedzwiecki D, Hagey JM, Davidson BA. Contraceptive practices during monitoring for molar pregnancy: A mixed methods analysis. Contraception. 2026 Jul 14;163:111556.
Sheffield, Sydney Mei, et al. “Contraceptive practices during monitoring for molar pregnancy: A mixed methods analysis.Contraception, vol. 163, July 2026, p. 111556. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2026.111556.
Sheffield SM, Fitch KC, Broadwater G, Niedzwiecki D, Hagey JM, Davidson BA. Contraceptive practices during monitoring for molar pregnancy: A mixed methods analysis. Contraception. 2026 Jul 14;163:111556.
Journal cover image

Published In

Contraception

DOI

EISSN

1879-0518

Publication Date

July 14, 2026

Volume

163

Start / End Page

111556

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • 4203 Health services and systems
  • 3215 Reproductive medicine
  • 3202 Clinical sciences