Skip to main content

Safety of nifedipine in angina pectoris: a meta-analysis.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Stason, WB; Schmid, CH; Niedzwiecki, D; Whiting, GW; Caubet, JF; Cory, D; Luo, D; Ross, SD; Chalmers, TC
Published in: Hypertension
January 1999

-Our objective was to compare cardiovascular event rates in patients with stable angina receiving nifedipine as monotherapy or combination therapy and in active drug controls. A MEDLARS search of published articles from 1966 to 1995 in English, French, German, Italian, or Spanish, supplemented by a manual search of bibliographies, identified 60 randomized controlled trials that met protocol criteria. Blinded articles were extracted by 2 physicians. The pooled risks of death, withdrawal, and cardiovascular event were computed and expressed as odds ratios (ORs) for all nifedipine formulations and relative to same study control drug regimens. Thirty cardiovascular events were reported in 2635 nifedipine exposures (1.14%) and 19 events in 2655 other active drug exposures (0.72%). Unadjusted ORs for nifedipine versus controls were 1.40 (95% CI, 0.56 to 3.49) for major events (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization procedure), 1.75 (95% CI, 0.83 to 3.67) for increased angina, and 1.61 (95% CI, 0.91 to 2.87) for all events (major events plus increased angina). Episodes of increased angina were more frequent on immediate-release nifedipine (OR, 4.19 [95% CI, 1.41 to 12.49]) and on nifedipine monotherapy (OR, 2.61 [95% CI, 1.30 to 5.26]). The OR for immediate-release nifedipine was significantly higher than that for sustained-release/extended-release nifedipine (P=0.001), and the OR for nifedipine monotherapy was higher than that for nifedipine combination therapy (P=0.03). Increased risks of cardiovascular events in patients with stable angina on nifedipine were due primarily to more episodes of increased angina, confined to the immediate-release formulation and to nifedipine monotherapy.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Hypertension

DOI

ISSN

0194-911X

Publication Date

January 1999

Volume

33

Issue

1

Start / End Page

24 / 31

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Vasodilator Agents
  • Time Factors
  • Safety
  • Risk Factors
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Prospective Studies
  • Placebos
  • Odds Ratio
  • Nitrates
  • Nifedipine
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Stason, W. B., Schmid, C. H., Niedzwiecki, D., Whiting, G. W., Caubet, J. F., Cory, D., … Chalmers, T. C. (1999). Safety of nifedipine in angina pectoris: a meta-analysis. Hypertension, 33(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.33.1.24
Stason, W. B., C. H. Schmid, D. Niedzwiecki, G. W. Whiting, J. F. Caubet, D. Cory, D. Luo, S. D. Ross, and T. C. Chalmers. “Safety of nifedipine in angina pectoris: a meta-analysis.Hypertension 33, no. 1 (January 1999): 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.33.1.24.
Stason WB, Schmid CH, Niedzwiecki D, Whiting GW, Caubet JF, Cory D, et al. Safety of nifedipine in angina pectoris: a meta-analysis. Hypertension. 1999 Jan;33(1):24–31.
Stason, W. B., et al. “Safety of nifedipine in angina pectoris: a meta-analysis.Hypertension, vol. 33, no. 1, Jan. 1999, pp. 24–31. Pubmed, doi:10.1161/01.hyp.33.1.24.
Stason WB, Schmid CH, Niedzwiecki D, Whiting GW, Caubet JF, Cory D, Luo D, Ross SD, Chalmers TC. Safety of nifedipine in angina pectoris: a meta-analysis. Hypertension. 1999 Jan;33(1):24–31.

Published In

Hypertension

DOI

ISSN

0194-911X

Publication Date

January 1999

Volume

33

Issue

1

Start / End Page

24 / 31

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Vasodilator Agents
  • Time Factors
  • Safety
  • Risk Factors
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Prospective Studies
  • Placebos
  • Odds Ratio
  • Nitrates
  • Nifedipine