Skip to main content

Man versus machine: Robust regional processing of EMI data

Publication ,  Conference
Huettel, LG; Baier, JM; Collins, LM
Published in: Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
December 20, 2004

The handheld F3 metal detector, developed by the MineLab Corporation, measures the responses of buried objects to electromagnetic pulses. These responses can be processed to determine whether a landmine is present. The simplest processor calculates the total energy in the response, thereby reducing the entire spatial and temporal response to a single value. This value, proportional to the amount of metal in the object, can then be compared to a predetermined threshold. The drawback of this common approach is that, although the threshold may be set so that few, if any, mines are missed, doing so may result in a high false alarm rate. Previous work has demonstrated that incorporating physics-based features into a Bayesian detection framework and performing simple, one-dimensional regional processing can significantly reduce the false alarm rate while maintaining the desired level of detection. 1 Based on these promising results, this approach has been extended to incorporate two-dimensional regional processing. At the test site, data was collected both manually and robotically using nearly identical protocols. Thus, in theory, measured responses should be similar and algorithm performance equivalent whether the detector was operated by a robot or a human. The robustness of various algorithms was evaluated by comparing performance across manual and robotic data sets. Certain physics-based feature detectors were relatively unaffected by the response variability introduced unintentionally by the human operator. However, other algorithms that incorporate more sensitive, often regional, features were able to provide greater gains for the robotic data set than for the manual data set. These results imply that there may be a tradeoff between performance and practical issues that need to be addressed when selecting an algorithm for implementation in a field setting.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

DOI

ISSN

0277-786X

Publication Date

December 20, 2004

Volume

5415

Issue

PART 2

Start / End Page

866 / 873

Related Subject Headings

  • 5102 Atomic, molecular and optical physics
  • 4009 Electronics, sensors and digital hardware
  • 4006 Communications engineering
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Huettel, L. G., Baier, J. M., & Collins, L. M. (2004). Man versus machine: Robust regional processing of EMI data. In Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering (Vol. 5415, pp. 866–873). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.541601
Huettel, L. G., J. M. Baier, and L. M. Collins. “Man versus machine: Robust regional processing of EMI data.” In Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 5415:866–73, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.541601.
Huettel LG, Baier JM, Collins LM. Man versus machine: Robust regional processing of EMI data. In: Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. 2004. p. 866–73.
Huettel, L. G., et al. “Man versus machine: Robust regional processing of EMI data.” Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 5415, no. PART 2, 2004, pp. 866–73. Scopus, doi:10.1117/12.541601.
Huettel LG, Baier JM, Collins LM. Man versus machine: Robust regional processing of EMI data. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. 2004. p. 866–873.

Published In

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

DOI

ISSN

0277-786X

Publication Date

December 20, 2004

Volume

5415

Issue

PART 2

Start / End Page

866 / 873

Related Subject Headings

  • 5102 Atomic, molecular and optical physics
  • 4009 Electronics, sensors and digital hardware
  • 4006 Communications engineering