Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Reducing ovarian cancer mortality through screening: Is it possible, and can we afford it?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Havrilesky, LJ; Sanders, GD; Kulasingam, S; Myers, ER
Published in: Gynecol Oncol
November 2008

OBJECTIVE: Ovarian cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women. Given the low prevalence of this disease, the effectiveness of screening strategies has not been established. We wished to estimate the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of potential screening strategies for ovarian cancer using population-specific data. METHODS: A Markov state transition model to simulate the natural history of ovarian cancer in a cohort of women age 20 to 100. Age-specific incidence and mortality rates were obtained from SEER. Base-case characteristics of a potential screening test were sensitivity 85%, specificity 95%, and cost $50. Outcome measures were mortality reduction, lifetime number of false positive screening tests, positive predictive value, years of life saved (YLS), lifetime costs in US dollars, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER, in cost/YLS). RESULTS: Model-predicted lifetime risk of ovarian cancer (1.38%), lifetime risk of death from ovarian cancer (0.95%), and stage distribution (stage I-19%; stage II-7%; stage III, IV, or unstaged - 74%) closely approximated SEER data. Annual screening resulted in 43% reduction in ovarian cancer mortality, with ICER of $73,469/YLS (base case) and $36,025/YLS (high-risk population) compared to no screening. In the base case, the average lifetime number of false positive tests is 1.06. Cost-effectiveness of screening is most sensitive to test frequency, specificity and cost. CONCLUSIONS: Annual screening for ovarian cancer has the potential to be cost effective, particularly in high-risk populations. Clinically acceptable positive predictive values are achieved if specificity exceeds 99%. Mortality reduction above 50% may not be achievable without screening intervals less than 12 months.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Gynecol Oncol

DOI

EISSN

1095-6859

Publication Date

November 2008

Volume

111

Issue

2

Start / End Page

179 / 187

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • United States
  • SEER Program
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Ovarian Neoplasms
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Models, Statistical
  • Middle Aged
  • Mass Screening
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Havrilesky, L. J., Sanders, G. D., Kulasingam, S., & Myers, E. R. (2008). Reducing ovarian cancer mortality through screening: Is it possible, and can we afford it? Gynecol Oncol, 111(2), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.07.006
Havrilesky, Laura J., Gillian D. Sanders, Shalini Kulasingam, and Evan R. Myers. “Reducing ovarian cancer mortality through screening: Is it possible, and can we afford it?Gynecol Oncol 111, no. 2 (November 2008): 179–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.07.006.
Havrilesky LJ, Sanders GD, Kulasingam S, Myers ER. Reducing ovarian cancer mortality through screening: Is it possible, and can we afford it? Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Nov;111(2):179–87.
Havrilesky, Laura J., et al. “Reducing ovarian cancer mortality through screening: Is it possible, and can we afford it?Gynecol Oncol, vol. 111, no. 2, Nov. 2008, pp. 179–87. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.07.006.
Havrilesky LJ, Sanders GD, Kulasingam S, Myers ER. Reducing ovarian cancer mortality through screening: Is it possible, and can we afford it? Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Nov;111(2):179–187.
Journal cover image

Published In

Gynecol Oncol

DOI

EISSN

1095-6859

Publication Date

November 2008

Volume

111

Issue

2

Start / End Page

179 / 187

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • United States
  • SEER Program
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Ovarian Neoplasms
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Models, Statistical
  • Middle Aged
  • Mass Screening