Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis vs. current practice neutropenia management in elderly breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Aapro, M; Schwenkglenks, M; Lyman, GH; Lopez Pousa, A; Lawrinson, S; Skacel, T; Bacon, P; von Minckwitz, G
Published in: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol
June 2010

We investigated the incidences of febrile neutropenia (FN) and related complications in elderly (> or =65 years) breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy supported by pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis (PP; n=150) or current practice (CP) neutropenia management (n=104) in a subanalysis of NeuCuP (Neulasta) vs. current practice neutropenia management). Studies involving regimens with moderately high to high (> or =15%) FN risk were identified by literature review, and individual patient data were integrated for analysis. FN incidence was 6% (95% CI: 2, 10%) in the PP group and 24% (95% CI: 16, 32%) in the CP group. In cycle 1, incidences were 3 and 15%, respectively. FN-related hospitalisation incidence was 5% (PP group) and 15% (CP group), while dose reductions (>/=15%) occurred in 15 and 29% of patients. Pegfilgrastim provided effective PP in elderly patients, a population who may be vulnerable to chemotherapy-related FN and for whom current practice may not provide adequate protection.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Crit Rev Oncol Hematol

DOI

EISSN

1879-0461

Publication Date

June 2010

Volume

74

Issue

3

Start / End Page

203 / 210

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Polyethylene Glycols
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Neutropenia
  • Humans
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
  • Filgrastim
  • Female
  • Breast Neoplasms
  • Antineoplastic Agents
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Aapro, M., Schwenkglenks, M., Lyman, G. H., Lopez Pousa, A., Lawrinson, S., Skacel, T., … von Minckwitz, G. (2010). Pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis vs. current practice neutropenia management in elderly breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 74(3), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.06.004
Aapro, Matti, Matthias Schwenkglenks, Gary H. Lyman, Antonio Lopez Pousa, Susan Lawrinson, Tomas Skacel, Pamela Bacon, and Gunter von Minckwitz. “Pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis vs. current practice neutropenia management in elderly breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 74, no. 3 (June 2010): 203–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.06.004.
Aapro M, Schwenkglenks M, Lyman GH, Lopez Pousa A, Lawrinson S, Skacel T, et al. Pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis vs. current practice neutropenia management in elderly breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2010 Jun;74(3):203–10.
Aapro, Matti, et al. “Pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis vs. current practice neutropenia management in elderly breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, vol. 74, no. 3, June 2010, pp. 203–10. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.06.004.
Aapro M, Schwenkglenks M, Lyman GH, Lopez Pousa A, Lawrinson S, Skacel T, Bacon P, von Minckwitz G. Pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis vs. current practice neutropenia management in elderly breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2010 Jun;74(3):203–210.
Journal cover image

Published In

Crit Rev Oncol Hematol

DOI

EISSN

1879-0461

Publication Date

June 2010

Volume

74

Issue

3

Start / End Page

203 / 210

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Polyethylene Glycols
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Neutropenia
  • Humans
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
  • Filgrastim
  • Female
  • Breast Neoplasms
  • Antineoplastic Agents