Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Importance of clinical measures of ischemia in the prognosis of patients with documented coronary artery disease.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Califf, RM; Mark, DB; Harrell, FE; Hlatky, MA; Lee, KL; Rosati, RA; Pryor, DB
Published in: J Am Coll Cardiol
January 1988

To examine the value of clinical measures of ischemia for stratifying prognosis, 5,886 consecutive patients who had symptomatic significant (greater than or equal to 75% stenosis) coronary artery disease were studied. Using the Cox regression model in a randomly selected half of the patients, the prognostically independent clinical variables were weighted and arranged into a simple angina score: angina score = angina course X (1 + daily angina frequency) + ST-T changes, where angina course was equal to 3 if unstable or variant angina was present, 2 if the patient's angina was progressive with nocturnal episodes, 1 if it was progressive without nocturnal symptoms and 0 if it was stable; 6 points were added for the presence of "ischemic" ST-T changes. This angina score was then validated in an independent patient sample. The score was a more powerful predictor of prognosis than was any individual anginal descriptor. Furthermore, the angina score added significant independent prognostic information to the patient's age, sex, coronary anatomy and left ventricular function. Patients with three vessel disease and a normal ventricle (n = 1,233) had a 2 year infarction-free survival rate of 90% with an angina score of 0 and a 68% survival rate with an angina score greater than or equal to 9. With an ejection fraction less than 50% and three vessel disease (n = 1,116), the corresponding infarction-free survival figures were 76 and 56%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Am Coll Cardiol

DOI

ISSN

0735-1097

Publication Date

January 1988

Volume

11

Issue

1

Start / End Page

20 / 26

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Stroke Volume
  • Risk Factors
  • Regression Analysis
  • Random Allocation
  • Prognosis
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Follow-Up Studies
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Califf, R. M., Mark, D. B., Harrell, F. E., Hlatky, M. A., Lee, K. L., Rosati, R. A., & Pryor, D. B. (1988). Importance of clinical measures of ischemia in the prognosis of patients with documented coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol, 11(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(88)90160-x
Califf, R. M., D. B. Mark, F. E. Harrell, M. A. Hlatky, K. L. Lee, R. A. Rosati, and D. B. Pryor. “Importance of clinical measures of ischemia in the prognosis of patients with documented coronary artery disease.J Am Coll Cardiol 11, no. 1 (January 1988): 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(88)90160-x.
Califf RM, Mark DB, Harrell FE, Hlatky MA, Lee KL, Rosati RA, et al. Importance of clinical measures of ischemia in the prognosis of patients with documented coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Jan;11(1):20–6.
Califf, R. M., et al. “Importance of clinical measures of ischemia in the prognosis of patients with documented coronary artery disease.J Am Coll Cardiol, vol. 11, no. 1, Jan. 1988, pp. 20–26. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/0735-1097(88)90160-x.
Califf RM, Mark DB, Harrell FE, Hlatky MA, Lee KL, Rosati RA, Pryor DB. Importance of clinical measures of ischemia in the prognosis of patients with documented coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Jan;11(1):20–26.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Am Coll Cardiol

DOI

ISSN

0735-1097

Publication Date

January 1988

Volume

11

Issue

1

Start / End Page

20 / 26

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Stroke Volume
  • Risk Factors
  • Regression Analysis
  • Random Allocation
  • Prognosis
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Follow-Up Studies