Skip to main content

Two temporal phases of light adaptation in retinal rods.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Calvert, PD; Govardovskii, VI; Arshavsky, VY; Makino, CL
Published in: J Gen Physiol
February 2002

Vertebrate rod photoreceptors adjust their sensitivity as they adapt during exposure to steady light. Light adaptation prevents the rod from saturating and significantly extends its dynamic range. We examined the time course of the onset of light adaptation in bullfrog rods and compared it with the projected onset of feedback reactions thought to underlie light adaptation on the molecular level. We found that adaptation developed in two distinct temporal phases: (1) a fast phase that operated within seconds after the onset of illumination, which is consistent with most previous reports of a 1-2-s time constant for the onset of adaptation; and (2) a slow phase that engaged over tens of seconds of continuous illumination. The fast phase desensitized the rods as much as 80-fold, and was observed at every light intensity tested. The slow phase was observed only at light intensities that suppressed more than half of the dark current. It provided an additional sensitivity loss of up to 40-fold before the rod saturated. Thus, rods achieved a total degree of adaptation of approximately 3,000-fold. Although the fast adaptation is likely to originate from the well characterized Ca(2+)-dependent feedback mechanisms regulating the activities of several phototransduction cascade components, the molecular mechanism underlying slow adaptation is unclear. We tested the hypothesis that the slow adaptation phase is mediated by cGMP dissociation from noncatalytic binding sites on the cGMP phosphodiesterase, which has been shown to reduce the lifetime of activated phosphodiesterase in vitro. Although cGMP dissociated from the noncatalytic binding sites in intact rods with kinetics approximating that for the slow adaptation phase, this hypothesis was ruled out because the intensity of light required for cGMP dissociation far exceeded that required to evoke the slow phase. Other possible mechanisms are discussed.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Gen Physiol

DOI

ISSN

0022-1295

Publication Date

February 2002

Volume

119

Issue

2

Start / End Page

129 / 145

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells
  • Rana catesbeiana
  • Physiology
  • Models, Biological
  • Light
  • Kinetics
  • In Vitro Techniques
  • Animals
  • Adaptation, Ocular
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Calvert, P. D., Govardovskii, V. I., Arshavsky, V. Y., & Makino, C. L. (2002). Two temporal phases of light adaptation in retinal rods. J Gen Physiol, 119(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.119.2.129
Calvert, Peter D., Victor I. Govardovskii, Vadim Y. Arshavsky, and Clint L. Makino. “Two temporal phases of light adaptation in retinal rods.J Gen Physiol 119, no. 2 (February 2002): 129–45. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.119.2.129.
Calvert PD, Govardovskii VI, Arshavsky VY, Makino CL. Two temporal phases of light adaptation in retinal rods. J Gen Physiol. 2002 Feb;119(2):129–45.
Calvert, Peter D., et al. “Two temporal phases of light adaptation in retinal rods.J Gen Physiol, vol. 119, no. 2, Feb. 2002, pp. 129–45. Pubmed, doi:10.1085/jgp.119.2.129.
Calvert PD, Govardovskii VI, Arshavsky VY, Makino CL. Two temporal phases of light adaptation in retinal rods. J Gen Physiol. 2002 Feb;119(2):129–145.

Published In

J Gen Physiol

DOI

ISSN

0022-1295

Publication Date

February 2002

Volume

119

Issue

2

Start / End Page

129 / 145

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells
  • Rana catesbeiana
  • Physiology
  • Models, Biological
  • Light
  • Kinetics
  • In Vitro Techniques
  • Animals
  • Adaptation, Ocular