Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Geller, EJ; Siddiqui, NY; Wu, JM; Visco, AG
Published in: Obstet Gynecol
December 2008

OBJECTIVE: To compare short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy with abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing robotic to abdominal sacrocolpopexy with placement of permanent mesh. The primary outcome was vaginal vault support on 6-week postoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system examination. Secondary outcomes included blood loss, operative time, length of stay, blood transfusion, pulmonary embolus, gastrointestinal or genitourinary tract injury, ileus, bowel obstruction, postoperative fever, pneumonia, wound infection, and urinary retention. RESULTS: The analysis included 178 patients (73 robotic and 105 abdominal sacrocolpopexy). There were no differences in age, race, or body mass index. Robotic sacrocolpopexy showed slight improvement on POP-Q "C" point (-9 compared with -8, P=.008) when compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy and was associated with less blood loss (103+/-96 mL compared with 255+/-155 mL, P<.001), longer total operative time (328+/-55 minutes compared with 225+/-61 minutes, P<.001), shorter length of stay (1.3+/-0.8 days compared with 2.7+/-1.4 days, P<.001), and a higher incidence of postoperative fever (4.1% compared with 0.0%, P=.04). There were no differences in other secondary outcomes. Operative time remained significantly greater in the robotic group (P<.001), and estimated blood loss remained lower (P<.001) when controlling for possible confounders. CONCLUSION: Robotic sacrocolpopexy demonstrated similar short-term vaginal vault support compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy, with longer operative time, less blood loss, and shorter length of stay. Long-term data are needed to assess the durability of this new minimally invasive procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Obstet Gynecol

DOI

ISSN

0029-7844

Publication Date

December 2008

Volume

112

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1201 / 1206

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Prolapse
  • Robotics
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
  • Middle Aged
  • Humans
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
  • Female
  • Cohort Studies
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Geller, E. J., Siddiqui, N. Y., Wu, J. M., & Visco, A. G. (2008). Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol, 112(6), 1201–1206. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818ce394
Geller, Elizabeth J., Nazema Y. Siddiqui, Jennifer M. Wu, and Anthony G. Visco. “Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy.Obstet Gynecol 112, no. 6 (December 2008): 1201–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818ce394.
Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;112(6):1201–6.
Geller, Elizabeth J., et al. “Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy.Obstet Gynecol, vol. 112, no. 6, Dec. 2008, pp. 1201–06. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818ce394.
Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;112(6):1201–1206.
Journal cover image

Published In

Obstet Gynecol

DOI

ISSN

0029-7844

Publication Date

December 2008

Volume

112

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1201 / 1206

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Prolapse
  • Robotics
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
  • Middle Aged
  • Humans
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
  • Female
  • Cohort Studies