Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.

Publication ,  Journal Article
MacMahon, H; Sanada, S; Doi, K; Giger, M; Xu, XW; Yin, FF; Montner, SM; Carlin, M
Published in: Radiographics
March 1991

To compare the image quality of computed radiographic (CR) with conventional screen-film images, the authors used a dual-image recording technique. Images were simultaneously acquired with a conventional screen-film combination and a storage-phosphor imaging plate loaded into a single cassette. Wiener spectra and modulation transfer function were compared for both image types. A preliminary observer performance test was conducted with chest images obtained with the dual-image recording technique on portable and fixed equipment. Analysis of physical parameters and observer test results suggests that the conventional screen-film system can provide slightly superior image quality, although the CR system has some advantage in bedside applications.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Radiographics

DOI

ISSN

0271-5333

Publication Date

March 1991

Volume

11

Issue

2

Start / End Page

259 / 268

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • X-Ray Intensifying Screens
  • X-Ray Film
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Spectrum Analysis
  • Radiography, Thoracic
  • Radiographic Image Enhancement
  • Radiation Dosage
  • ROC Curve
  • Observer Variation
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
MacMahon, H., Sanada, S., Doi, K., Giger, M., Xu, X. W., Yin, F. F., … Carlin, M. (1991). Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique. Radiographics, 11(2), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.11.2.2028063
MacMahon, H., S. Sanada, K. Doi, M. Giger, X. W. Xu, F. F. Yin, S. M. Montner, and M. Carlin. “Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.Radiographics 11, no. 2 (March 1991): 259–68. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.11.2.2028063.
MacMahon H, Sanada S, Doi K, Giger M, Xu XW, Yin FF, et al. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique. Radiographics. 1991 Mar;11(2):259–68.
MacMahon, H., et al. “Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.Radiographics, vol. 11, no. 2, Mar. 1991, pp. 259–68. Pubmed, doi:10.1148/radiographics.11.2.2028063.
MacMahon H, Sanada S, Doi K, Giger M, Xu XW, Yin FF, Montner SM, Carlin M. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique. Radiographics. 1991 Mar;11(2):259–268.
Journal cover image

Published In

Radiographics

DOI

ISSN

0271-5333

Publication Date

March 1991

Volume

11

Issue

2

Start / End Page

259 / 268

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • X-Ray Intensifying Screens
  • X-Ray Film
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Spectrum Analysis
  • Radiography, Thoracic
  • Radiographic Image Enhancement
  • Radiation Dosage
  • ROC Curve
  • Observer Variation
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging