Creating illusions of past encounter through brief exposure.
Titchener (1928) suggested that briefly glancing at a scene could make it appear strangely familiar when it was fully processed moments later. The closest laboratory demonstration used words as stimuli, and showed that briefly glancing at a to-be-judged word increased the subject's belief that it had been presented in an earlier study list (Jacoby & Whitehouse, 1989). We evaluated whether a hasty glance could elicit a false belief in a prior encounter, from a time and place outside of the experiment. This goal precluded using word stimuli, so we had subjects evaluate unfamiliar symbols. Each symbol was preceded by a brief exposure to an identical symbol, a different symbol, or no symbol. A brief glance at an identical symbol increased attributions to preexperimental experience, relative to a glance at a different symbol or no symbol, providing a possible mechanism for common illusions of false recognition.
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
DOI
EISSN
ISSN
Publication Date
Volume
Issue
Start / End Page
Related Subject Headings
- Recognition, Psychology
- Psychophysics
- Photic Stimulation
- Pattern Recognition, Visual
- Memory, Short-Term
- Illusions
- Humans
- Experimental Psychology
- Discrimination Learning
- Deja Vu
Citation
Published In
DOI
EISSN
ISSN
Publication Date
Volume
Issue
Start / End Page
Related Subject Headings
- Recognition, Psychology
- Psychophysics
- Photic Stimulation
- Pattern Recognition, Visual
- Memory, Short-Term
- Illusions
- Humans
- Experimental Psychology
- Discrimination Learning
- Deja Vu