Reply from the editorialist [2]
Publication
, Journal Article
Goldstein, LB
Published in: Neurology
September 1, 2007
Duke Scholars
Published In
Neurology
DOI
ISSN
0028-3878
Publication Date
September 1, 2007
Volume
69
Issue
10
Start / End Page
1061 / 1062
Related Subject Headings
- Neurology & Neurosurgery
- 3209 Neurosciences
- 3202 Clinical sciences
- 1702 Cognitive Sciences
- 1109 Neurosciences
- 1103 Clinical Sciences
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Goldstein, L. B. (2007). Reply from the editorialist [2]. Neurology, 69(10), 1061–1062. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000284701.87493.a3
Goldstein, L. B. “Reply from the editorialist [2].” Neurology 69, no. 10 (September 1, 2007): 1061–62. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000284701.87493.a3.
Goldstein LB. Reply from the editorialist [2]. Neurology. 2007 Sep 1;69(10):1061–2.
Goldstein, L. B. “Reply from the editorialist [2].” Neurology, vol. 69, no. 10, Sept. 2007, pp. 1061–62. Scopus, doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000284701.87493.a3.
Goldstein LB. Reply from the editorialist [2]. Neurology. 2007 Sep 1;69(10):1061–1062.
Published In
Neurology
DOI
ISSN
0028-3878
Publication Date
September 1, 2007
Volume
69
Issue
10
Start / End Page
1061 / 1062
Related Subject Headings
- Neurology & Neurosurgery
- 3209 Neurosciences
- 3202 Clinical sciences
- 1702 Cognitive Sciences
- 1109 Neurosciences
- 1103 Clinical Sciences