Respiratory monitoring without machinery
The clinical examination remains an important tool for monitoring respiratory function in the critically ill. Noninvasive monitors appear to offer little additional accuracy for precision to the results of clinical examination for the assessment of airway function, ventilatory drive, and ventilatory muscle function. Moreover, the clinical examination coupled with the chest radiograph remains the cornerstone for evaluation of both parenchymal and pleural disease. On the other hand, technology has clear advantages over the clinical examination in providing the necessary accuracy and precision for the assessment of oxygen and carbondioxide tensions. Pulmonary-vascular and right-heart function can be evaluated reasonably well by clinical examination, but invasive monitoring is still needed for definitive answers. In the critically ill patient, continuous noninvasive monitoring appears to have a distinct advantage over clinical spot-check measurements because such continuous monitoring provides information on patient-ventilator system integrity (redundant systems should include pressure, flow, and, perhaps, CO
Duke Scholars
Published In
ISSN
Publication Date
Volume
Issue
Start / End Page
Related Subject Headings
- Respiratory System
- 3202 Clinical sciences
- 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
- 1103 Clinical Sciences
- 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
Citation
Published In
ISSN
Publication Date
Volume
Issue
Start / End Page
Related Subject Headings
- Respiratory System
- 3202 Clinical sciences
- 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
- 1103 Clinical Sciences
- 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology