Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Two decades of river restoration in California: What can we learn?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Kondolf, GM; Anderson, S; Lave, R; Pagano, L; Merenlender, A; Bernhardt, ES
Published in: Restoration Ecology
September 1, 2007

As part of the National River Restoration Science Synthesis (NRRSS), we developed a summary database of 4,023 stream restoration projects built in California since 1980, from which we randomly selected 44 records for in-depth interviews with project managers. Despite substantial difficulties in gathering the data, we were able to draw conclusions about current design, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation practices used in California projects and compare them with national trends. Although more than half of the projects for which we conducted interviews were located in watersheds for which a management or assessment plan had been prepared, these plans had a limited impact on site selection. We also found that the state lacks a consistent framework for design, monitoring, and reporting restoration projects, and that although monitoring is far more widespread than the information in the NRRSS summary database would suggest, there are still problems with the type, duration, and reporting of monitoring. The general lack of systematic, objective assessment of completed projects hinders the advance of restoration science. © 2007 Society for Ecological Restoration International.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Restoration Ecology

DOI

EISSN

1526-100X

ISSN

1061-2971

Publication Date

September 1, 2007

Volume

15

Issue

3

Start / End Page

516 / 523

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 41 Environmental sciences
  • 31 Biological sciences
  • 06 Biological Sciences
  • 05 Environmental Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kondolf, G. M., Anderson, S., Lave, R., Pagano, L., Merenlender, A., & Bernhardt, E. S. (2007). Two decades of river restoration in California: What can we learn? Restoration Ecology, 15(3), 516–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00247.x
Kondolf, G. M., S. Anderson, R. Lave, L. Pagano, A. Merenlender, and E. S. Bernhardt. “Two decades of river restoration in California: What can we learn?Restoration Ecology 15, no. 3 (September 1, 2007): 516–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00247.x.
Kondolf GM, Anderson S, Lave R, Pagano L, Merenlender A, Bernhardt ES. Two decades of river restoration in California: What can we learn? Restoration Ecology. 2007 Sep 1;15(3):516–23.
Kondolf, G. M., et al. “Two decades of river restoration in California: What can we learn?Restoration Ecology, vol. 15, no. 3, Sept. 2007, pp. 516–23. Scopus, doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00247.x.
Kondolf GM, Anderson S, Lave R, Pagano L, Merenlender A, Bernhardt ES. Two decades of river restoration in California: What can we learn? Restoration Ecology. 2007 Sep 1;15(3):516–523.
Journal cover image

Published In

Restoration Ecology

DOI

EISSN

1526-100X

ISSN

1061-2971

Publication Date

September 1, 2007

Volume

15

Issue

3

Start / End Page

516 / 523

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 41 Environmental sciences
  • 31 Biological sciences
  • 06 Biological Sciences
  • 05 Environmental Sciences