A comparison of debulking versus dilatation of bifurcation coronary arterial narrowings (from the CAVEAT I Trial). Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial-I.
Publication
, Journal Article
Brener, SJ; Leya, FS; Apperson-Hansen, C; Cowley, MJ; Califf, RM; Topol, EJ
Published in: Am J Cardiol
November 1, 1996
We compared the effectiveness of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and directional coronary atherectomy for the management of bifurcation coronary lesions in 1,012 patients enrolled in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial-I. Directional coronary atherectomy was associated with less angiographic residual stenosis, but with a higher rate of side-branch closure and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Am J Cardiol
DOI
ISSN
0002-9149
Publication Date
November 1, 1996
Volume
78
Issue
9
Start / End Page
1039 / 1041
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Treatment Outcome
- Risk Factors
- Recurrence
- Postoperative Complications
- Myocardial Infarction
- Multivariate Analysis
- Middle Aged
- Male
- Logistic Models
- Humans
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Brener, S. J., Leya, F. S., Apperson-Hansen, C., Cowley, M. J., Califf, R. M., & Topol, E. J. (1996). A comparison of debulking versus dilatation of bifurcation coronary arterial narrowings (from the CAVEAT I Trial). Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial-I. Am J Cardiol, 78(9), 1039–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00531-0
Brener, S. J., F. S. Leya, C. Apperson-Hansen, M. J. Cowley, R. M. Califf, and E. J. Topol. “A comparison of debulking versus dilatation of bifurcation coronary arterial narrowings (from the CAVEAT I Trial). Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial-I.” Am J Cardiol 78, no. 9 (November 1, 1996): 1039–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00531-0.
Brener SJ, Leya FS, Apperson-Hansen C, Cowley MJ, Califf RM, Topol EJ. A comparison of debulking versus dilatation of bifurcation coronary arterial narrowings (from the CAVEAT I Trial). Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial-I. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Nov 1;78(9):1039–41.
Brener, S. J., et al. “A comparison of debulking versus dilatation of bifurcation coronary arterial narrowings (from the CAVEAT I Trial). Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial-I.” Am J Cardiol, vol. 78, no. 9, Nov. 1996, pp. 1039–41. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00531-0.
Brener SJ, Leya FS, Apperson-Hansen C, Cowley MJ, Califf RM, Topol EJ. A comparison of debulking versus dilatation of bifurcation coronary arterial narrowings (from the CAVEAT I Trial). Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial-I. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Nov 1;78(9):1039–1041.
Published In
Am J Cardiol
DOI
ISSN
0002-9149
Publication Date
November 1, 1996
Volume
78
Issue
9
Start / End Page
1039 / 1041
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Treatment Outcome
- Risk Factors
- Recurrence
- Postoperative Complications
- Myocardial Infarction
- Multivariate Analysis
- Middle Aged
- Male
- Logistic Models
- Humans