Tests for 2 × 2 tables in clinical trials
Publication
, Journal Article
Hasselblad, V; Lokhnygina, Y
Published in: Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods
January 1, 2007
Five standard tests are compared: chi-squared, Fisher's exact, Yates' correction, Fisher's exact mid-p, and Barnard's. Yates' is always inferior to Fisher's exact. Fisher's exact is so conservative that one should look for alternatives. For certain sample sizes, Fisher's mid-p or Barnard's test maintain the nominal alpha and have superior power. Copyright © 2007 JMASM, Inc.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods
DOI
EISSN
1538-9472
ISSN
1538-9472
Publication Date
January 1, 2007
Volume
6
Issue
2
Start / End Page
456 / 468
Related Subject Headings
- Statistics & Probability
- 4905 Statistics
- 0104 Statistics
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Hasselblad, V., & Lokhnygina, Y. (2007). Tests for 2 × 2 tables in clinical trials. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(2), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1193890140
Hasselblad, V., and Y. Lokhnygina. “Tests for 2 × 2 tables in clinical trials.” Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 6, no. 2 (January 1, 2007): 456–68. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1193890140.
Hasselblad V, Lokhnygina Y. Tests for 2 × 2 tables in clinical trials. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 2007 Jan 1;6(2):456–68.
Hasselblad, V., and Y. Lokhnygina. “Tests for 2 × 2 tables in clinical trials.” Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, vol. 6, no. 2, Jan. 2007, pp. 456–68. Scopus, doi:10.22237/jmasm/1193890140.
Hasselblad V, Lokhnygina Y. Tests for 2 × 2 tables in clinical trials. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 2007 Jan 1;6(2):456–468.
Published In
Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods
DOI
EISSN
1538-9472
ISSN
1538-9472
Publication Date
January 1, 2007
Volume
6
Issue
2
Start / End Page
456 / 468
Related Subject Headings
- Statistics & Probability
- 4905 Statistics
- 0104 Statistics