Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Multi-modal examination of psychological and interpersonal distinctions among MPI coping clusters: a preliminary study.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Junghaenel, DU; Keefe, FJ; Broderick, JE
Published in: J Pain
January 2010

UNLABELLED: The Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) is a widely used instrument to characterize distinct psychosocial subgroups of patients with chronic pain: Adaptive (AC), Dysfunctional (DYS), and Interpersonally Distressed (ID). To date, several questions remain about the validity and distinctiveness of the patient clusters, and continued scientific attention has strongly been recommended. It is unclear if AC patients experience better adjustment or merely present themselves favorably. Moreover, differences in psychological distress and interpersonal relations between DYS and ID patients are equivocal. The present study is the first to utilize comprehensive informant ratings to extend prior validity research on the MPI. We employed a multimodal methodology consisting of patient self-report, parallel informant ratings, and behavioral measures. Ninety-nine patients with chronic pain, their partners, and providers participated. They completed measures of patients' psychological distress and social relations. We also systematically observed patients' pain behavior. Results provided strong support for the validity of the AC cluster in that patients' positive adaptation was reliably corroborated by informants. The differentiating characteristics between the 2 maladaptive clusters, however, remain elusive. We found evidence that DYS patients' distress appeared to be illness specific rather than generalized; however, both clusters were equally associated with social distress and partner/caregiver burden. PERSPECTIVE: An adaptive style of coping with chronic pain is reliably recognized by patients' partners and healthcare providers. Differences between a dysfunctional and an interpersonally distressed coping style, however, remain unclear. Patients with a dysfunctional style appear more distressed by their illness but both styles are characterized by social difficulties.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Pain

DOI

EISSN

1528-8447

Publication Date

January 2010

Volume

11

Issue

1

Start / End Page

87 / 96

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Spouses
  • Social Behavior
  • Self Concept
  • Psychological Tests
  • Pain
  • Middle Aged
  • Mental Health
  • Male
  • Low Back Pain
  • Interpersonal Relations
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Junghaenel, D. U., Keefe, F. J., & Broderick, J. E. (2010). Multi-modal examination of psychological and interpersonal distinctions among MPI coping clusters: a preliminary study. J Pain, 11(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.006
Junghaenel, Doerte U., Francis J. Keefe, and Joan E. Broderick. “Multi-modal examination of psychological and interpersonal distinctions among MPI coping clusters: a preliminary study.J Pain 11, no. 1 (January 2010): 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.006.
Junghaenel, Doerte U., et al. “Multi-modal examination of psychological and interpersonal distinctions among MPI coping clusters: a preliminary study.J Pain, vol. 11, no. 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 87–96. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.006.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Pain

DOI

EISSN

1528-8447

Publication Date

January 2010

Volume

11

Issue

1

Start / End Page

87 / 96

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Spouses
  • Social Behavior
  • Self Concept
  • Psychological Tests
  • Pain
  • Middle Aged
  • Mental Health
  • Male
  • Low Back Pain
  • Interpersonal Relations