Skip to main content

Definition of functionally important mechanistic differences among selective estrogen receptor down-regulators.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Wittmann, BM; Sherk, A; McDonnell, DP
Published in: Cancer Res
October 1, 2007

One subclass of antiestrogens, the selective estrogen receptor down-regulators (SERDs), have received considerable attention of late as they competitively inhibit estrogen binding and induce a rapid, proteasome-dependent degradation of the receptor. Contained within this class of molecules is the steroidal antiestrogen ICI182,780 (faslodex), recently approved for the treatment of metastatic cancer, and GW5638/DPC974, a SERD that is currently being evaluated in the clinic. Given that mechanistic differences between different selective estrogen receptor modulators have been translated into important clinical profiles, it was of interest to determine if the SERD subclass of ligands were likewise functionally or mechanistically distinguishable. In this study, we show that although the steroidal and nonsteroidal SERDs target ERalpha for degradation, the underlying mechanism(s) are different. Of note was the identification of a specific protein-protein interaction surface presented on ERalpha in the presence of the ICI182,780-activated receptor which is required for degradation. Interestingly, this surface is also presented on ERalpha in the presence of RU58,668, a SERD that is chemically distinct from ICI182,780. This surface is not required for GW5638-mediated degradation, and thus, this SERD seems to affect ERalpha down-regulation by a different mechanism. These data suggest that sequencing of therapies using drugs of this class is likely to be possible. Finally, because of the unmet need for orally active SERDS that function similarly to ICI182,780, we have used the insights from these mechanistic studies to develop and validate a high-throughput screen for compounds of this class with improved pharmaceutical properties.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Cancer Res

DOI

ISSN

0008-5472

Publication Date

October 1, 2007

Volume

67

Issue

19

Start / End Page

9549 / 9560

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Subcellular Fractions
  • Stilbenes
  • Protein Conformation
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Molecular Sequence Data
  • Humans
  • Hela Cells
  • HeLa Cells
  • Fulvestrant
  • Estrogen Receptor alpha
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Wittmann, B. M., Sherk, A., & McDonnell, D. P. (2007). Definition of functionally important mechanistic differences among selective estrogen receptor down-regulators. Cancer Res, 67(19), 9549–9560. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1590
Wittmann, Bryan M., Andrea Sherk, and Donald P. McDonnell. “Definition of functionally important mechanistic differences among selective estrogen receptor down-regulators.Cancer Res 67, no. 19 (October 1, 2007): 9549–60. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1590.
Wittmann BM, Sherk A, McDonnell DP. Definition of functionally important mechanistic differences among selective estrogen receptor down-regulators. Cancer Res. 2007 Oct 1;67(19):9549–60.
Wittmann, Bryan M., et al. “Definition of functionally important mechanistic differences among selective estrogen receptor down-regulators.Cancer Res, vol. 67, no. 19, Oct. 2007, pp. 9549–60. Pubmed, doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1590.
Wittmann BM, Sherk A, McDonnell DP. Definition of functionally important mechanistic differences among selective estrogen receptor down-regulators. Cancer Res. 2007 Oct 1;67(19):9549–9560.

Published In

Cancer Res

DOI

ISSN

0008-5472

Publication Date

October 1, 2007

Volume

67

Issue

19

Start / End Page

9549 / 9560

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Subcellular Fractions
  • Stilbenes
  • Protein Conformation
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Molecular Sequence Data
  • Humans
  • Hela Cells
  • HeLa Cells
  • Fulvestrant
  • Estrogen Receptor alpha