Scholars@Duke

The great debate editorial, revisited [1]

Publication ,  Journal Article
Schneiderman, N; Williams, RB
Published in: Psychosomatic Medicine
January 1, 2006
Published version (DOI)

Duke Scholars

Redford B. Williams Jr.
Author Redford B. Williams Jr. Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Behavioral Medicine & Neur ...

Published In

Psychosomatic Medicine

DOI

10.1097/01.psy.0000227691.88628.69

ISSN

0033-3174

Publication Date

January 1, 2006

Volume

68

Issue

4

Start / End Page

636 / 638

Related Subject Headings

  • Psychiatry
  • 5202 Biological psychology
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Schneiderman, N., & Williams, R. B. (2006). The great debate editorial, revisited [1]. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68(4), 636–638. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000227691.88628.69
Schneiderman, N., and R. B. Williams. “The great debate editorial, revisited [1].” Psychosomatic Medicine 68, no. 4 (January 1, 2006): 636–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000227691.88628.69.
Schneiderman N, Williams RB. The great debate editorial, revisited [1]. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2006 Jan 1;68(4):636–8.
Schneiderman, N., and R. B. Williams. “The great debate editorial, revisited [1].” Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 68, no. 4, Jan. 2006, pp. 636–38. Scopus, doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000227691.88628.69.
Schneiderman N, Williams RB. The great debate editorial, revisited [1]. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2006 Jan 1;68(4):636–638.

Published In

Psychosomatic Medicine

DOI

10.1097/01.psy.0000227691.88628.69

ISSN

0033-3174

Publication Date

January 1, 2006

Volume

68

Issue

4

Start / End Page

636 / 638

Related Subject Headings

  • Psychiatry
  • 5202 Biological psychology
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences