Why pay for performance may be incompatible with quality improvement.
Publication
, Journal Article
Woolhandler, S; Ariely, D; Himmelstein, DU
Published in: Bmj (Clinical Research Ed.)
August 2012
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
Bmj (Clinical Research Ed.)
DOI
EISSN
1756-1833
ISSN
0959-8138
Publication Date
August 2012
Volume
345
Start / End Page
e5015
Related Subject Headings
- Reimbursement, Incentive
- Physician Incentive Plans
- Motivation
- General & Internal Medicine
- Checklist
- 1117 Public Health and Health Services
- 1103 Clinical Sciences
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Woolhandler, S., Ariely, D., & Himmelstein, D. U. (2012). Why pay for performance may be incompatible with quality improvement. Bmj (Clinical Research Ed.), 345, e5015. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5015
Woolhandler, Steffie, Dan Ariely, and David U. Himmelstein. “Why pay for performance may be incompatible with quality improvement.” Bmj (Clinical Research Ed.) 345 (August 2012): e5015. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5015.
Woolhandler S, Ariely D, Himmelstein DU. Why pay for performance may be incompatible with quality improvement. Bmj (Clinical Research Ed). 2012 Aug;345:e5015.
Woolhandler, Steffie, et al. “Why pay for performance may be incompatible with quality improvement.” Bmj (Clinical Research Ed.), vol. 345, Aug. 2012, p. e5015. Epmc, doi:10.1136/bmj.e5015.
Woolhandler S, Ariely D, Himmelstein DU. Why pay for performance may be incompatible with quality improvement. Bmj (Clinical Research Ed). 2012 Aug;345:e5015.
Published In
Bmj (Clinical Research Ed.)
DOI
EISSN
1756-1833
ISSN
0959-8138
Publication Date
August 2012
Volume
345
Start / End Page
e5015
Related Subject Headings
- Reimbursement, Incentive
- Physician Incentive Plans
- Motivation
- General & Internal Medicine
- Checklist
- 1117 Public Health and Health Services
- 1103 Clinical Sciences