Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel

A comparison of the Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB) with "traditional" neuropsychological testing instruments.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Smith, PJ; Need, AC; Cirulli, ET; Chiba-Falek, O; Attix, DK
Published in: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol
2013

The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) is frequently used in research protocols and increasingly in clinical practice. Despite the frequency of its use, important aspects of its measurement validity have yet to be established in healthy adults. Two hundred and fifty-five individuals completed the CANTAB and traditional neuropsychological tests commonly used in clinical practice, including selected subtests from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Animal Naming, Trail Making Tests A and B, the Stroop test, and the Green Story Recall test. Results showed that CANTAB subtests were modestly correlated with traditional subtests. Correlations between CANTAB subtests and traditional subtests were less consistent when age and education were controlled for. In conclusion, the CANTAB shows modest associations with traditional neuropsychological test measures.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Clin Exp Neuropsychol

DOI

EISSN

1744-411X

Publication Date

2013

Volume

35

Issue

3

Start / End Page

319 / 328

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Reaction Time
  • Psychometrics
  • Neuropsychological Tests
  • Middle Aged
  • Mental Recall
  • Male
  • Intelligence
  • Humans
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Smith, P. J., Need, A. C., Cirulli, E. T., Chiba-Falek, O., & Attix, D. K. (2013). A comparison of the Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB) with "traditional" neuropsychological testing instruments. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 35(3), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2013.771618
Smith, Patrick J., Anna C. Need, Elizabeth T. Cirulli, Ornit Chiba-Falek, and Deborah K. Attix. “A comparison of the Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB) with "traditional" neuropsychological testing instruments.J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 35, no. 3 (2013): 319–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2013.771618.
Smith PJ, Need AC, Cirulli ET, Chiba-Falek O, Attix DK. A comparison of the Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB) with "traditional" neuropsychological testing instruments. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2013;35(3):319–28.
Smith, Patrick J., et al. “A comparison of the Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB) with "traditional" neuropsychological testing instruments.J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, vol. 35, no. 3, 2013, pp. 319–28. Pubmed, doi:10.1080/13803395.2013.771618.
Smith PJ, Need AC, Cirulli ET, Chiba-Falek O, Attix DK. A comparison of the Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB) with "traditional" neuropsychological testing instruments. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2013;35(3):319–328.

Published In

J Clin Exp Neuropsychol

DOI

EISSN

1744-411X

Publication Date

2013

Volume

35

Issue

3

Start / End Page

319 / 328

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Reaction Time
  • Psychometrics
  • Neuropsychological Tests
  • Middle Aged
  • Mental Recall
  • Male
  • Intelligence
  • Humans
  • Female