Skip to main content

Adding renal dysfunction to CHADS2 did not improve prediction of stroke or systemic embolism in AF

Publication ,  Journal Article
Piccini, JP; Stevens, SR; Chang, Y
Published in: Annals of Internal Medicine
April 16, 2013

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Annals of Internal Medicine

DOI

EISSN

1539-3704

ISSN

0003-4819

Publication Date

April 16, 2013

Volume

158

Issue

8

Related Subject Headings

  • General & Internal Medicine
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Piccini, J. P., Stevens, S. R., & Chang, Y. (2013). Adding renal dysfunction to CHADS2 did not improve prediction of stroke or systemic embolism in AF. Annals of Internal Medicine, 158(8). https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-02013
Piccini, J. P., S. R. Stevens, and Y. Chang. “Adding renal dysfunction to CHADS2 did not improve prediction of stroke or systemic embolism in AF.” Annals of Internal Medicine 158, no. 8 (April 16, 2013). https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-02013.
Piccini JP, Stevens SR, Chang Y. Adding renal dysfunction to CHADS2 did not improve prediction of stroke or systemic embolism in AF. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2013 Apr 16;158(8).
Piccini, J. P., et al. “Adding renal dysfunction to CHADS2 did not improve prediction of stroke or systemic embolism in AF.” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 158, no. 8, Apr. 2013. Scopus, doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-02013.
Piccini JP, Stevens SR, Chang Y. Adding renal dysfunction to CHADS2 did not improve prediction of stroke or systemic embolism in AF. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2013 Apr 16;158(8).

Published In

Annals of Internal Medicine

DOI

EISSN

1539-3704

ISSN

0003-4819

Publication Date

April 16, 2013

Volume

158

Issue

8

Related Subject Headings

  • General & Internal Medicine
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences