Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Reply to "Using relative frequency estimation of transcranial magnetic stimulation motor threshold does not allow to draw any conclusions about true threshold".

Publication ,  Journal Article
Luber, B; Lisanby, SH
Published in: Clin Neurophysiol
June 2014

Duke Scholars

Published In

Clin Neurophysiol

DOI

EISSN

1872-8952

Publication Date

June 2014

Volume

125

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1286 / 1287

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Patient Safety
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Motor Cortex
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Evoked Potentials, Motor
  • 3209 Neurosciences
  • 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Luber, B., & Lisanby, S. H. (2014). Reply to "Using relative frequency estimation of transcranial magnetic stimulation motor threshold does not allow to draw any conclusions about true threshold". Clin Neurophysiol, 125(6), 1286–1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.10.011
Journal cover image

Published In

Clin Neurophysiol

DOI

EISSN

1872-8952

Publication Date

June 2014

Volume

125

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1286 / 1287

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Patient Safety
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Motor Cortex
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Evoked Potentials, Motor
  • 3209 Neurosciences
  • 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences