Reply to "Using relative frequency estimation of transcranial magnetic stimulation motor threshold does not allow to draw any conclusions about true threshold".
Publication
, Journal Article
Luber, B; Lisanby, SH
Published in: Clin Neurophysiol
June 2014
Duke Scholars
Published In
Clin Neurophysiol
DOI
EISSN
1872-8952
Publication Date
June 2014
Volume
125
Issue
6
Start / End Page
1286 / 1287
Location
Netherlands
Related Subject Headings
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- Patient Safety
- Neurology & Neurosurgery
- Motor Cortex
- Male
- Humans
- Female
- Evoked Potentials, Motor
- 3209 Neurosciences
- 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Luber, B., & Lisanby, S. H. (2014). Reply to "Using relative frequency estimation of transcranial magnetic stimulation motor threshold does not allow to draw any conclusions about true threshold". Clin Neurophysiol, 125(6), 1286–1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.10.011
Published In
Clin Neurophysiol
DOI
EISSN
1872-8952
Publication Date
June 2014
Volume
125
Issue
6
Start / End Page
1286 / 1287
Location
Netherlands
Related Subject Headings
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- Patient Safety
- Neurology & Neurosurgery
- Motor Cortex
- Male
- Humans
- Female
- Evoked Potentials, Motor
- 3209 Neurosciences
- 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences