Journal ArticleReview of Economic Design · December 1, 2023
A large body of game-theoretic work examines the process by which uncertainty can lead to inefficient war. In a typical crisis bargaining model, players negotiate according to a pre-specified game form and no player has the ability to change the rules of t ...
Full textCite
Journal ArticleAmerican Journal of Political Science · July 1, 2018
All rebel organizations start weak, but how do they grow and achieve favorable conflict outcomes? We present a theoretical model that allows for rebel organizations to gain support beyond their “core” and build their bargaining power during fighting. We hi ...
Full textCite
Journal ArticleEconomic Theory · October 1, 2017
Habit formation is a well-documented behavioral regularity in psychology and economics; however, its implications on bargaining outcomes have so far been overlooked. I study an otherwise standard Rubinstein bargaining model with habit-forming players. In e ...
Full textCite
Journal ArticleInternational Studies Quarterly · September 1, 2009
The "audience cost" literature argues that highly-resolved leaders can use public threats to credibly signal their resolve in incomplete-information crisis bargaining, thereby overcoming informational asymmetries that lead to war. If democracies are better ...
Full textCite
Journal ArticleAmerican Journal of Political Science · October 1, 2007
According to a leading rationalist explanation, war can break out when a large, rapid shift of power causes a credible commitment problem. This mechanism does not specify how inefficient fighting can resolve this cause, so it is an incomplete explanation o ...
Full textCite
Journal ArticleJournal of Theoretical Politics · October 1, 2005
I address the role of social mobility in political transitions. I develop a political economy model of regime transitions that incorporates social mobility as a key feature of the economy capturing the political attitudes toward redistribution. I show that ...
Full textCite
Journal ArticleAmerican Political Science Review · August 1, 2005
We use a formal bargaining model to examine why, in many domestic and international bargaining situations, one or both negotiators make public statements in front of their constituents committing themselves to obtaining certain benefits in the negotiations ...
Full textOpen AccessCite