Skip to main content

Defining a Hospital Volume Threshold for Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States.

Publication ,  Conference
Adam, MA; Thomas, S; Youngwirth, L; Pappas, T; Roman, SA; Sosa, JA
Published in: JAMA Surg
April 1, 2017

IMPORTANCE: There is increasing interest in expanding use of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD). This procedure is complex, with data suggesting a significant association between hospital volume and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is an MIPD hospital volume threshold for which patient outcomes could be optimized. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients undergoing MIPD were identified from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample from 2000 to 2012. Multivariable models with restricted cubic splines were used to identify a hospital volume threshold by plotting annual hospital volume against the adjusted odds of postoperative complications. The current analysis was conducted on August 16, 2016. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Incidence of any complication. RESULTS: Of the 865 patients who underwent MIPD, 474 (55%) were male and the median patient age was 67 years (interquartile range, 59-74 years). Among the patients, 747 (86%) had cancer and 91 (11%) had benign conditions/pancreatitis. Overall, 410 patients (47%) had postoperative complications and 31 (4%) died in-hospital. After adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics, increasing hospital volume was associated with reduced complications (overall association P < .001); the likelihood of experiencing a complication declined as hospital volume increased up to 22 cases per year (95% CI, 21-23). Median hospital volume was 6 cases per year (range, 1-60). Most patients (n = 717; 83%) underwent the procedure at low-volume (≤22 cases per year) hospitals. After adjustment for patient mix, undergoing MIPD at low- vs high-volume hospitals was significantly associated with increased odds for postoperative complications (odds ratio, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.03-2.94; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Hospital volume is significantly associated with improved outcomes from MIPD, with a threshold of 22 cases per year. Most patients undergo MIPD at low-volume hospitals. Protocols outlining minimum procedural volume thresholds should be considered to facilitate safer dissemination of MIPD.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

JAMA Surg

DOI

EISSN

2168-6262

Publication Date

April 1, 2017

Volume

152

Issue

4

Start / End Page

336 / 342

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy
  • Pancreatic Diseases
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Laparoscopy
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Adam, M. A., Thomas, S., Youngwirth, L., Pappas, T., Roman, S. A., & Sosa, J. A. (2017). Defining a Hospital Volume Threshold for Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States. In JAMA Surg (Vol. 152, pp. 336–342). United States. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4753
Adam, Mohamed Abdelgadir, Samantha Thomas, Linda Youngwirth, Theodore Pappas, Sanziana A. Roman, and Julie A. Sosa. “Defining a Hospital Volume Threshold for Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States.” In JAMA Surg, 152:336–42, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4753.
Adam MA, Thomas S, Youngwirth L, Pappas T, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Defining a Hospital Volume Threshold for Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States. In: JAMA Surg. 2017. p. 336–42.
Adam, Mohamed Abdelgadir, et al. “Defining a Hospital Volume Threshold for Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States.JAMA Surg, vol. 152, no. 4, 2017, pp. 336–42. Pubmed, doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4753.
Adam MA, Thomas S, Youngwirth L, Pappas T, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Defining a Hospital Volume Threshold for Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States. JAMA Surg. 2017. p. 336–342.

Published In

JAMA Surg

DOI

EISSN

2168-6262

Publication Date

April 1, 2017

Volume

152

Issue

4

Start / End Page

336 / 342

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy
  • Pancreatic Diseases
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Laparoscopy
  • Humans