Opinion on Schmidt et al.
Publication
, Journal Article
Batinic-Haberle, I; Tovmasyan, A; Spasojevic, I
Published in: Antioxid Redox Signal
March 20, 2016
Duke Scholars
Published In
Antioxid Redox Signal
DOI
EISSN
1557-7716
Publication Date
March 20, 2016
Volume
24
Issue
9
Start / End Page
518 / 524
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
- 3205 Medical biochemistry and metabolomics
- 3101 Biochemistry and cell biology
- 1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences
- 1101 Medical Biochemistry and Metabolomics
- 0601 Biochemistry and Cell Biology
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Batinic-Haberle, I., Tovmasyan, A., & Spasojevic, I. (2016). Opinion on Schmidt et al. Antioxid Redox Signal, 24(9), 518–524. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2015.6623
Batinic-Haberle, Ines, Artak Tovmasyan, and Ivan Spasojevic. “Opinion on Schmidt et al.” Antioxid Redox Signal 24, no. 9 (March 20, 2016): 518–24. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2015.6623.
Batinic-Haberle I, Tovmasyan A, Spasojevic I. Opinion on Schmidt et al. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2016 Mar 20;24(9):518–24.
Batinic-Haberle, Ines, et al. “Opinion on Schmidt et al.” Antioxid Redox Signal, vol. 24, no. 9, Mar. 2016, pp. 518–24. Pubmed, doi:10.1089/ars.2015.6623.
Batinic-Haberle I, Tovmasyan A, Spasojevic I. Opinion on Schmidt et al. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2016 Mar 20;24(9):518–524.
Published In
Antioxid Redox Signal
DOI
EISSN
1557-7716
Publication Date
March 20, 2016
Volume
24
Issue
9
Start / End Page
518 / 524
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
- 3205 Medical biochemistry and metabolomics
- 3101 Biochemistry and cell biology
- 1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences
- 1101 Medical Biochemistry and Metabolomics
- 0601 Biochemistry and Cell Biology