Skip to main content

Clinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Berg, DD; Barnett, CF; Kenigsberg, BB; Papolos, A; Alviar, CL; Baird-Zars, VM; Barsness, GW; Bohula, EA; Brennan, J; Burke, JA; Carnicelli, AP ...
Published in: Circ Heart Fail
November 2019

BACKGROUND: Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices provide hemodynamic assistance for shock refractory to pharmacological treatment. Most registries have focused on single devices or specific etiologies of shock, limiting data regarding overall practice patterns with temporary MCS in cardiac intensive care units. METHODS: The CCCTN (Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network) is a multicenter network of tertiary CICUs in North America. Between September 2017 and September 2018, each center (n=16) contributed a 2-month snapshot of consecutive medical CICU admissions. RESULTS: Of the 270 admissions using temporary MCS, 33% had acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (CS), 31% had CS not related to acute myocardial infarction, 11% had mixed shock, and 22% had an indication other than shock. Among all 585 admissions with CS or mixed shock, 34% used temporary MCS during the CICU stay with substantial variation between centers (range: 17%-50%). The most common temporary MCS devices were intraaortic balloon pumps (72%), Impella (17%), and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (11%), although intraaortic balloon pump use also varied between centers (range: 40%-100%). Patients managed with intraaortic balloon pump versus other forms of MCS (advanced MCS) had lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and less severe metabolic derangements. Illness severity was similar at high- versus low-MCS utilizing centers and at centers with more advanced MCS use. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in the use of temporary MCS among patients with shock in tertiary CICUs. While hospital-level variation in temporary MCS device selection is not explained by differences in illness severity, patient-level variation appears to be related, at least in part, to illness severity.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Circ Heart Fail

DOI

EISSN

1941-3297

Publication Date

November 2019

Volume

12

Issue

11

Start / End Page

e006635

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Time Factors
  • Shock, Cardiogenic
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Risk Factors
  • Recovery of Function
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'
  • Patient Admission
  • North America
  • Middle Aged
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Berg, D. D., Barnett, C. F., Kenigsberg, B. B., Papolos, A., Alviar, C. L., Baird-Zars, V. M., … Morrow, D. A. (2019). Clinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry. Circ Heart Fail, 12(11), e006635. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006635
Berg, David D., Christopher F. Barnett, Benjamin B. Kenigsberg, Alexander Papolos, Carlos L. Alviar, Vivian M. Baird-Zars, Gregory W. Barsness, et al. “Clinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry.Circ Heart Fail 12, no. 11 (November 2019): e006635. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006635.
Berg DD, Barnett CF, Kenigsberg BB, Papolos A, Alviar CL, Baird-Zars VM, et al. Clinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry. Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Nov;12(11):e006635.
Berg, David D., et al. “Clinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry.Circ Heart Fail, vol. 12, no. 11, Nov. 2019, p. e006635. Pubmed, doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006635.
Berg DD, Barnett CF, Kenigsberg BB, Papolos A, Alviar CL, Baird-Zars VM, Barsness GW, Bohula EA, Brennan J, Burke JA, Carnicelli AP, Chaudhry S-P, Cremer PC, Daniels LB, DeFilippis AP, Gerber DA, Granger CB, Hollenberg S, Horowitz JM, Gladden JD, Katz JN, Keeley EC, Keller N, Kontos MC, Lawler PR, Menon V, Metkus TS, Miller PE, Nativi-Nicolau J, Newby LK, Park J-G, Phreaner N, Roswell RO, Schulman SP, Sinha SS, Snell RJ, Solomon MA, Teuteberg JJ, Tymchak W, van Diepen S, Morrow DA. Clinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry. Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Nov;12(11):e006635.

Published In

Circ Heart Fail

DOI

EISSN

1941-3297

Publication Date

November 2019

Volume

12

Issue

11

Start / End Page

e006635

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Time Factors
  • Shock, Cardiogenic
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Risk Factors
  • Recovery of Function
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'
  • Patient Admission
  • North America
  • Middle Aged