Lung retransplantation in the modern era.

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction remains the leading cause of long-term morbidity and mortality for lung transplant recipients. Lung retransplantation currently represents the only therapeutic option for patients for refractory allograft dysfunction. However, debate remains regarding both the efficacy and ethicality of lung retransplantation in light of the shortage of lung allografts. The aim of this review is to discuss the available literature on lung retransplantation in the current era. Through this we hope to provide insight into ideal patient selection, donor organ selection, surgical approaches, and future considerations within the field in order to improve outcomes and best address organ utilization while a waitlist continues to exist. Lung retransplantation in select patients can offer comparable survival outcomes to primary lung transplantation. However, several risk factors including retransplantation with the first year of primary transplantation, older age, poor functional status, and ICU level requirements prior to transplantation are associated with worsened outcomes. Donor organ selection considerations are comparable to those in primary lung transplantation. However, surgical approach is often impacted by dense pleural and mediastinal adhesions in the recipient which increase the complexity of the hilar dissection. The postoperative course is often more complex for patients undergoing retransplantation compared to those undergoing primary lung transplant as well. However, pending more data on long term outcomes in lung retransplantation and the potential impact of retransplant recipients on waitlist mortality, lung retransplantation should remain in use primarily for the treatment of chronic graft dysfunction in carefully selected patients.

Duke Scholars

Author Alvin Rucker  

Author Jacob A Klapper Surgery, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery

Author Matthew Hartwig Surgery, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery