Sutphin, J., Wallace, M., Yang, J. C., Corriere, M. A., Secemsky, E. A., Johnson, R., … Reed, S. D. (2023). PCR106 Comparing Maximum-Acceptable Risk Estimates from 2 Preference-Elicitation Methods: A Discrete-Choice Experiment and a Threshold-Technique Exercise. In Value in Health (Vol. 26, pp. S331–S331). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2023.03.1884

Sutphin, J., M. Wallace, J. C. Yang, M. A. Corriere, E. A. Secemsky, R. Johnson, J. M. Gonzalez, et al. “PCR106 Comparing Maximum-Acceptable Risk Estimates from 2 Preference-Elicitation Methods: A Discrete-Choice Experiment and a Threshold-Technique Exercise.” In Value in Health, 26:S331–S331. Elsevier BV, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2023.03.1884.

Sutphin J, Wallace M, Yang JC, Corriere MA, Secemsky EA, Johnson R, et al. PCR106 Comparing Maximum-Acceptable Risk Estimates from 2 Preference-Elicitation Methods: A Discrete-Choice Experiment and a Threshold-Technique Exercise. In: Value in Health. Elsevier BV; 2023. p. S331–S331.

Sutphin, J., et al. “PCR106 Comparing Maximum-Acceptable Risk Estimates from 2 Preference-Elicitation Methods: A Discrete-Choice Experiment and a Threshold-Technique Exercise.” Value in Health, vol. 26, no. 6, Elsevier BV, 2023, pp. S331–S331. Crossref, doi:10.1016/j.jval.2023.03.1884.

Sutphin J, Wallace M, Yang JC, Corriere MA, Secemsky EA, Johnson R, Gonzalez JM, Tarver ME, Saha A, Gebben D, Chen AL, Farb A, Malone M, Babalola O, Rorer E, Buckley D, Capanna K, Reed SD. PCR106 Comparing Maximum-Acceptable Risk Estimates from 2 Preference-Elicitation Methods: A Discrete-Choice Experiment and a Threshold-Technique Exercise. Value in Health. Elsevier BV; 2023. p. S331–S331.