Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Comparative Effectiveness of a Second Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Versus a Non-Tumor Necrosis Factor Biologic in the Treatment of Patients With Polyarticular-Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Mannion, ML; Amin, S; Balevic, S; Chang, M-L; Correll, CK; Kearsley-Fleet, L; Hyrich, KL; Beukelman, T ...
Published in: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)
August 2024

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a second tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) versus a non-TNFi biologic following discontinuation of a TNFi for patients with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA). METHODS: Using the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry, patients with pJIA who started receiving a second biologic following a first TNFi were identified. Patients were required to have no active uveitis on the index date and a visit six months after the index date. Outcome measures included Clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score with a maximum of 10 active joints (cJADAS10), cJADAS10 inactive disease (ID; ≤2.5) and cJADAS10 minimal disease activity (MiDA; ≤5). Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated using propensity score quintiles to compare outcomes at six months following second biologic initiation. RESULTS: There were 216 patients included, 84% initially received etanercept, and most patients stopped receiving it because of its ineffectiveness (74%). A total of 183 (85%) started receiving a second TNFi, and 33 (15%) started receiving a non-TNFi. Adalimumab was the most common second biologic received (71% overall, 84% of second TNFi), and tocilizumab was the most common non-TNFi second biologic received (9% overall, 58% of non-TNFi). There was no difference between receiving TNFi versus non-TNFi in cJADAS10 ID (29% vs 25%; aOR 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-3.20) or at least MiDA (43% vs 39%; aOR 1.11, 95% CI 0.47-2.62) at six months. CONCLUSION: Most patients with pJIA started receiving TNFi rather than non-TNFi as their second biologic, and there were no differences in disease activity at six months.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)

DOI

EISSN

2151-4658

Publication Date

August 2024

Volume

76

Issue

8

Start / End Page

1090 / 1098

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Registries
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Etanercept
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research
  • Child, Preschool
  • Child
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Mannion, M. L., Amin, S., Balevic, S., Chang, M.-L., Correll, C. K., Kearsley-Fleet, L., … Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry Investigators and the UK Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Biologics Register Investigators. (2024). Comparative Effectiveness of a Second Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Versus a Non-Tumor Necrosis Factor Biologic in the Treatment of Patients With Polyarticular-Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 76(8), 1090–1098. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25339
Mannion, Melissa L., Shahla Amin, Stephen Balevic, Min-Lee Chang, Colleen K. Correll, Lianne Kearsley-Fleet, Kimme L. Hyrich, Timothy Beukelman, and Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry Investigators and the UK Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Biologics Register Investigators. “Comparative Effectiveness of a Second Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Versus a Non-Tumor Necrosis Factor Biologic in the Treatment of Patients With Polyarticular-Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 76, no. 8 (August 2024): 1090–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25339.
Mannion ML, Amin S, Balevic S, Chang M-L, Correll CK, Kearsley-Fleet L, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of a Second Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Versus a Non-Tumor Necrosis Factor Biologic in the Treatment of Patients With Polyarticular-Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2024 Aug;76(8):1090–8.
Mannion, Melissa L., et al. “Comparative Effectiveness of a Second Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Versus a Non-Tumor Necrosis Factor Biologic in the Treatment of Patients With Polyarticular-Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), vol. 76, no. 8, Aug. 2024, pp. 1090–98. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/acr.25339.
Mannion ML, Amin S, Balevic S, Chang M-L, Correll CK, Kearsley-Fleet L, Hyrich KL, Beukelman T, Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry Investigators and the UK Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Biologics Register Investigators. Comparative Effectiveness of a Second Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Versus a Non-Tumor Necrosis Factor Biologic in the Treatment of Patients With Polyarticular-Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2024 Aug;76(8):1090–1098.
Journal cover image

Published In

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)

DOI

EISSN

2151-4658

Publication Date

August 2024

Volume

76

Issue

8

Start / End Page

1090 / 1098

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Registries
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Etanercept
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research
  • Child, Preschool
  • Child