The short end of the stick: Access to lung transplantation for short-statured patients in the composite allocation score era.

Short-statured lung transplant candidates experience longer waitlist times than taller ones. The new composite allocation score (CAS) includes height to enhance allocation equity. We assessed the impact of CAS on waitlist outcomes for different height groups. We queried a national transplant database for lung transplant candidates listed from 2021 to 2024, categorized into 4 height groups: ≤162 cm, 162 to 170 cm, 170 to 176.5 cm, and >176.5 cm. Competing risk and Cox regression models assessed the impact of height on waitlist outcomes, including an interaction term between height and allocation era to assess effect modification. Of the 9383 candidates identified, those >176.5 cm had an increased likelihood of transplantation (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR]: 1.15) compared to the 170 to 176.5 cm group, while those ≤162 cm had a lower likelihood (sHR: 0.70). The overall likelihood of transplantation was higher in the CAS era (sHR: 1.17). The interaction term for height ≤162 cm and CAS era was significant (sHR: 1.15), suggesting a modest improvement in access for this group under CAS. Further, candidates ≤162 cm experienced a higher hazard of mortality in the CAS era (HR: 1.60). These findings suggest that CAS modestly improves access for the shortest candidates, but refinements are needed to address ongoing inequities in this population.

Duke Scholars

Author Kunal Patel Surgery, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery

Author Matthew Hartwig Surgery, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery

Author Jacob A Klapper Surgery, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery