Back-to-base Versus In-transit Machine Perfusion in Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation: Insights From a National Registry.

BACKGROUND: Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) improves utilization of extended criteria liver grafts, but the optimal delivery strategy-whether in-transit or back-to-base-remains uncertain. METHODS: Adult recipients of donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplants between January 1, 2022, and January 1, 2024, were identified using the national transplant database. In-transit NMP was defined as grafts coded as machine perfused; back-to-base NMP was inferred for noncoded grafts with a cold ischemia time of ≥10 h. Baseline characteristics, geographic distribution, and outcomes-including acute rejection, length of stay, and graft survival-were compared. Multivariable Cox regression was used to adjust for dialysis and recipient hospitalization status. A sensitivity analysis was performed, limited to cases with cold ischemia time of ≥10 h across both groups. RESULTS: Among 1217 DCD liver transplants using NMP, 936 (77%) were in-transit and 281 (23%) were back-to-base. In-transit NMP was more commonly used in the Western United States, whereas back-to-base was concentrated in the Midwest and Southeast. In-transit recipients had higher rates of pretransplant dialysis (3.1% versus 0.7%; P < 0.05) and shorter preservation times (14.1 versus 16.0 h; P < 0.05). Median hospital stay was shorter in the in-transit group (8 versus 9 d, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in acute rejection (P = 0.15) or 1-y graft survival (93.3% versus 90.5%, P = 0.23). In adjusted analysis, back-to-base NMP was not associated with increased graft failure risk (hazard ratio 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-2.38; P = 0.13). Findings were consistent in the sensitivity analysis (n = 1001). CONCLUSIONS: In-transit and back-to-base NMP strategies yield comparable clinical outcomes in DCD liver transplantation. Strategy selection may be guided by logistical infrastructure and center-level expertise without compromising recipient outcomes.

Duke Scholars

Author Lisa M McElroy Surgery, Abdominal Transplant Surgery

Author Aparna Sharad Rege Surgery, Abdominal Transplant Surgery

Author Kadiyala Venkata Ravindra Surgery, Abdominal Transplant Surgery

Author Bradley Henry Collins Surgery, Abdominal Transplant Surgery

Author Debra L Sudan Surgery, Abdominal Transplant Surgery

Author Stuart Johnston Knechtle Surgery, Abdominal Transplant Surgery

Author Andrew Serghios Barbas Surgery, Abdominal Transplant Surgery