Skip to main content

Outcome of endoscopic minor papillotomy in patients with symptomatic pancreas divisum.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Gerke, H; Byrne, MF; Stiffler, HL; Obando, JV; Mitchell, RM; Jowell, PS; Branch, MS; Baillie, J
Published in: JOP
May 2004

CONTEXT: Pancreas divisum has been associated with recurrent acute pancreatitis, chronic abdominal pain without elevated pancreatic enzymes, and chronic pancreatitis. Prior studies suggest that endoscopic minor papillotomy benefits certain symptomatic pancreas divisum patients. However, the data are quite limited and there is a lack of long-term follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To describe a retrospective study of endoscopic minor papillotomy for pancreas divisum. PATIENTS: Eighty-nine adult patients who underwent endoscopic minor papillotomy at our referral center were included in the study. Median follow-up was 29 months. INTERVENTION: We conducted a telephone survey. Fifty-three patients were available for the telephone survey. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (60.4%) reported immediate improvement: however, symptoms recurred in 17 (53.1% of the immediate responders). Repeat endoscopic interventions were performed in 8 patients, with long-term improvement in two. Overall long-term improvement was achieved in 17 patients (32.1%). Results of minor papillotomy were more favorable for patients with recurrent, well-defined bouts of pancreatitis (immediate improvement: P=0.036; long-term improvement: P=0.064) compared to those with pancreatitis who reported continuous pain and those without clinical evidence of pancreatitis (immediate improvement: 73.3%, 42.9% and 44.4%, respectively; long-term improvement: 43.3%, 21.4%, and 11.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term benefit from endoscopic minor papillotomy using strict criteria is poorer than suggested from previous studies. However, pancreas divisum patients with well-defined bouts of pancreatitis are more likely to benefit from endoscopic minor papillotomy than those without symptom-free intervals between "attacks" and those with pain that is not associated with elevated pancreatic enzymes.

Duke Scholars

Published In

JOP

EISSN

1590-8577

Publication Date

May 2004

Volume

5

Issue

3

Start / End Page

122 / 131

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Stents
  • Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Pancreatitis
  • Pancreas
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Gerke, H., Byrne, M. F., Stiffler, H. L., Obando, J. V., Mitchell, R. M., Jowell, P. S., … Baillie, J. (2004). Outcome of endoscopic minor papillotomy in patients with symptomatic pancreas divisum. JOP, 5(3), 122–131.
Gerke, Henning, Michael F. Byrne, Helen L. Stiffler, Jorge V. Obando, Robert M. Mitchell, Paul S. Jowell, Malcolm S. Branch, and John Baillie. “Outcome of endoscopic minor papillotomy in patients with symptomatic pancreas divisum.JOP 5, no. 3 (May 2004): 122–31.
Gerke H, Byrne MF, Stiffler HL, Obando JV, Mitchell RM, Jowell PS, et al. Outcome of endoscopic minor papillotomy in patients with symptomatic pancreas divisum. JOP. 2004 May;5(3):122–31.
Gerke, Henning, et al. “Outcome of endoscopic minor papillotomy in patients with symptomatic pancreas divisum.JOP, vol. 5, no. 3, May 2004, pp. 122–31.
Gerke H, Byrne MF, Stiffler HL, Obando JV, Mitchell RM, Jowell PS, Branch MS, Baillie J. Outcome of endoscopic minor papillotomy in patients with symptomatic pancreas divisum. JOP. 2004 May;5(3):122–131.

Published In

JOP

EISSN

1590-8577

Publication Date

May 2004

Volume

5

Issue

3

Start / End Page

122 / 131

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Stents
  • Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Pancreatitis
  • Pancreas
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans