Comments on Dodson et al., A technical comparison of evaluating asbestos concentration by phase contrast microscopy (PCM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and analytical transmission electron microscopy (ATEM) as illustrated from data generated from a case report.
Publication
, Journal Article
Roggli, VL; Sporn, TA; Butnor, KJ
Published in: Inhal Toxicol
September 2008
Duke Scholars
Published In
Inhal Toxicol
DOI
EISSN
1091-7691
Publication Date
September 2008
Volume
20
Issue
12
Start / End Page
1113 / 1114
Location
England
Related Subject Headings
- Toxicology
- Microscopy, Phase-Contrast
- Microscopy, Electron, Transmission
- Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
- Lung
- Humans
- Asbestos
- 3214 Pharmacology and pharmaceutical sciences
- 1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Roggli, V. L., Sporn, T. A., & Butnor, K. J. (2008). Comments on Dodson et al., A technical comparison of evaluating asbestos concentration by phase contrast microscopy (PCM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and analytical transmission electron microscopy (ATEM) as illustrated from data generated from a case report. Inhal Toxicol, 20(12), 1113–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/08958370802433724
Roggli, Victor L., Thomas A. Sporn, and Kelly J. Butnor. “Comments on Dodson et al., A technical comparison of evaluating asbestos concentration by phase contrast microscopy (PCM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and analytical transmission electron microscopy (ATEM) as illustrated from data generated from a case report.” Inhal Toxicol 20, no. 12 (September 2008): 1113–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08958370802433724.
Roggli VL, Sporn TA, Butnor KJ. Comments on Dodson et al., A technical comparison of evaluating asbestos concentration by phase contrast microscopy (PCM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and analytical transmission electron microscopy (ATEM) as illustrated from data generated from a case report. Inhal Toxicol. 2008 Sep;20(12):1113–4.
Roggli, Victor L., et al. “Comments on Dodson et al., A technical comparison of evaluating asbestos concentration by phase contrast microscopy (PCM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and analytical transmission electron microscopy (ATEM) as illustrated from data generated from a case report.” Inhal Toxicol, vol. 20, no. 12, Sept. 2008, pp. 1113–14. Pubmed, doi:10.1080/08958370802433724.
Roggli VL, Sporn TA, Butnor KJ. Comments on Dodson et al., A technical comparison of evaluating asbestos concentration by phase contrast microscopy (PCM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and analytical transmission electron microscopy (ATEM) as illustrated from data generated from a case report. Inhal Toxicol. 2008 Sep;20(12):1113–1114.
Published In
Inhal Toxicol
DOI
EISSN
1091-7691
Publication Date
September 2008
Volume
20
Issue
12
Start / End Page
1113 / 1114
Location
England
Related Subject Headings
- Toxicology
- Microscopy, Phase-Contrast
- Microscopy, Electron, Transmission
- Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
- Lung
- Humans
- Asbestos
- 3214 Pharmacology and pharmaceutical sciences
- 1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences